other people can replicate them and produce the same results
1 of 9
positivists
positivists prefer them becuase they achieve their main goal of reliability.
2 of 9
interpritivists
reject them because they fail to achieve thier main goal of validity
3 of 9
pratical problems
studying the past- cannot be used for the past as the variables cannot be controlled
smaller samples- difficult to investigate on a large scale
it is imppossible to control all variables in scoiety
individuals are complex- it is hard to matchthe members in the control and experiental group
open system- can only work with science. society is an open system where factors annot be controlled
the hawthorne effect
the expectancy effect
4 of 9
ethical problems
it is wrong to mislead people
informed consent
potential physical and mental harm to partcipants
sensitive subjects
debriefing
5 of 9
hawthorne effect
Where the subjects of a research study know they are being studied and begin to behave differently as a result. Undermining the studies validity.
6 of 9
alternatives
field experiments
questionnaires
observations
7 of 9
information
it is controlled and in an artificial environment
there must be two groups; the control and the experimetnal group
we can discover cause and effect relationships
8 of 9
theoretical issues
positivists- expeiments are good becuase of thier reliability. this is becuase they can control the variables, produces quantitative data and is detached. However, it cant be representative.
interpretivists- experiments are bad becuase we are different from plants, rocks and other natural things. our actions cn only be understood by the choices we make and why
Comments
No comments have yet been made