James and Religion
4.5 / 5 based on 2 ratings
- Created by: Kate H
- Created on: 21-01-15 14:05
Hampton Court Conference
Millenary Petition- April 1603
- 'Eased and relieved' of popish practices E.g wedding rings and bowing to name of Jesus
- Educated preaching ministry
- Extensive but moderate- no attempt to get rid of bishops
Hampton Court Conference- January 1604
- Requests put forward by petition
- King James Bible decided upon-1611
- Attempt to end excessive use of excommunciation failed
- Attempt to solve Church poverty failed- Parliament benefitted from inappropriation of tithes. 1580s, only 600 out of 9000 parishes provided adequate stipend to clergy
- Only four to five modearte Purtians- radicals disappointed
- Failed to win demands
- James dimissed small things as trivial e.g removal of surplices
- James began to take anti-Puritan steps- appointed Richard Bancroft to enforce uniformity (non-Puritan)
- Deep seated dissatifcation- Puritan Revolution 1642
- Seperation- John Robinson and Smith New World
1 of 9
Convocation and Canons
- February 1604
- Resolve disputed matters
- All ministers must subscribe to to three artivles supporting King's supremacy, agree to 39 Articles and accept the Book of Common Prayer.
- Only use authorised services- attack on Puritan ministers who were accustomed to giving long sermons
- Serious blow- could no longer ignore practices they disapproved of
- 90 Puritan ministers lost livings
- Mistake for James- created opposition
2 of 9
Effect of George Abbot on Puritans
- 1611
- Calvinist, sympathetic to Puritans
- Example of James compromising
- General desire to see a more learned ministry and many bishops encouraged this by frequently preaching to themselves
- Pleased Puritans, lectureships endowed where townsfolk were encouraged to attend
- Non-conformity over small things like wearing a surplice reappeared- generally tolerated
- Until 1618 religious divisons seemd to have resolved
3 of 9
Catholic hopes for reign and initial leniancy
- Promised he wouldn't persecute 'any that will be quiet'
- Hope that they would be able to practice in private, unmolested
- Needed a relaxation of crippling recusany fines
- Recusancy fines reduced and fell to less than a quarter of their level before 1603
- Short lived and caused protest- told Salisbury he wouldn't persecute for faith but never intended to extend a general tolerance
4 of 9
Change of policy 1604 and reasons
- All priests and Jesuits ourdered out of kingdom
- November- recusancy fines to be collected in full
- Many Puritans in parliament- kept fines to themselves
- Due to adverse reaction of tolerance from Puritans in Parliament- 1604 Parliament passed an act calling for 'due execution of statutes' against 'an manner of recusant'
- Didn't want to antagonise Parliament- use Catholics as bargaining tool for union with Scotland
- Needed recusancy fines to raise revenue
- Election of transgient Pope Clement- stirct and unwilling to compromise
- No help from Spain- Gunpowder Plot
5 of 9
Effects of Gunpowder Plot
- James upset- Venetian ambassador 'the King is in terror'
- Recusancy fines increased
- Catholics forbidden to live in or near London or hold public offices
- Oath of Allegiance 1606- denied Pope's authority to depose Kings- to appease Puritans and single out extremists
- Example of James' leniancy; most Catholics happy to obey
- Apology of 1608- justification
- No further trouble from Catholics
- Massive subsidy £400,000
6 of 9
Fear of Catholicism 1618-1625
- Howard faction had pushed Spanish match from 1614- if succesful Catholic worship in London
- Tolerance for Catholics increasing
- Failure to support Protestant cause on the continent
- Relaxation of recusancy fine 1622-1623
- 30YW led to polarisation
7 of 9
Changing Attitude to Arminians/ Later Attitude to
- 1618- Conference of Dort- Opposes Arminians
- 1620s- they upheld James' authority while people were protesting about Spain and Catholicism
- 1622- Directions to Preachers- forbidding clergy to preach about predestination or damnation- insult to Puritans
- 1624- Richard Montagu's 'New gag for an old goose'- attacked Calvinist beliefs- criticised for actions. ' if this be popery then i am a papist'
- Commitment to Protestant cause not doubted (went on to allow war)
- May 1618- Book of Sports- blow to Puritans- Sunday for worship. Many clergy refused to read it. James withdrew- compromise
8 of 9
Scotland/ Puritans
- Wanted to force conformity with CoE
- Won nobles away from Kirk- needed their support
- Bishops imposed in 1618
- Articles of Perth 1618- deeply unpopular especially kneeling for Communion.
- Not strictly enforced and new prayer book that had been prepared in 1619 wasn't introduced
9 of 9
Related discussions on The Student Room
- MY YEAR 12 JOURNAL!!!! (Grow your grades) »
- OCR A-level History British period study and enquiry: All exams 10th Jun 2022 »
- A-level History Study Group 2023-2024 »
- A level history coursework »
- OCR A-Level History Unit 1 (Y101-Y113) - 9th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- OCR AS-Level History Unit 1 (Y136-Y138,Y143) - 17th May [Exam Chat] »
- AQA A-Level History 1D and 2O Notes »
- AQA A Level History Paper 1 (7042/1A to 1L) - 24 May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- History 2022 paper »
- Edexcel A Level History Paper 3: 9HI0 30-39 - 22 June 2022 [Exam Chat] »
Similar History resources:
0.0 / 5
4.5 / 5 based on 7 ratings
2.5 / 5 based on 3 ratings
0.0 / 5
0.0 / 5
4.5 / 5 based on 26 ratings
2.5 / 5 based on 2 ratings
4.0 / 5 based on 2 ratings
0.0 / 5
3.0 / 5 based on 3 ratings
Comments
No comments have yet been made