History - Industrial and Agricultural Change (Theme 2)
- Created by: LeksiCameron
- Created on: 18-01-18 11:01
Workers' Control of Industry
Key Features:
- Workers' councils (soviets) take direct control of the factories, both large and small
- They plan production targets and determine pay and conditions
- The previous management are driven out
State Capitalism
Key Features:
- Large factories are taken over by the state and capitalist owners are forced out
- Instead of handing control to the workers, specialist, well-paid managers are employed
- Small factories are controlled by workers or handed back to capitalists
Land Reform
Key Features:
- Land confiscated from the Church and landowners and distributed among the peasantry for their use
- Use of the land was decided by peasant committees; peasants could cultivate it but did not own it
- Private ownership of land abolished forever
War Communism
Key Features:
- Grain requisitioning and rationing to ensure supplies reach soldiers and workers
- Labour discipline to increase production and supply Red Army
- Complete state control of industry; including small factories and workshops
Economic Challenges
Russian industry had only really grown from 1890
80% were still peasants in an agricultural economy
Russia's economy was backwards compared to the West
Lenin wanted to build socialism but Russia had not yet gone through capitalism
World War Oner had devastated an already weak economy
Land Reform
Lenin's slogan during 1917 was 'Peace, Bread, Land'
The Decree on Land (October 1917) gained support from peasantry, who usually backed the SRs
Land was confiscated from the Church and aristocracy for peasant use
State Capitalism (March - June 1918)
Lenin placed industrial efficiency before workers' control
Large industries were nationalised and run by the state
Despite slogan 'All power to the soviets', factories were actually ran by well-paid specialists
Small factories were given to worker control or back to the capitalists
Policy ended as Civil War intensifies
War Communism (aims)
To ensure Communist victory in the Civil War by:
- Supplying the Red Army with food and equipment
- Maximising industrial production of war goods
- Increasing state control of the economy
- Changing the economy so that it conforms more closely to communist ideology
War Communism (Consequences)
Succeeded in supplying the Red Army and helping them to wirn the Civil War by 1921
Fall in agricultural output = 1921 harvest 46% of 1913 harvest
6 million died of famine
Industrial workforce down = 3 million (1917) to 1.2 million (1922)
Growth of black market = supplies around 60% of food
Political unrest: Tambov rebellion (1920-1) and Krondstadt rebellion (1921)
Working day increased to 11 hours
Work made compulsary for all able-bodied aged between 16 and 50
Aims of the NEP
Desire for political stability = economic compromise
Need to stimulate grain production and end famine
To buiuld socialism in hostile conditions - by 1921 the revolution had failed to spread
Implementation of the NEP
Grain requisitions replaced by a tax in kind
Denationalisation of small workshops and factories (fewer than 20 workers)
Large industry still nationalised
Money reintroducted and new emphasis on profit
Positive Outcomes of the NEP
NEP was popular among the peasants (majority of the population)
Political and economic stability was restored
Tax income helped to facilitate electrification programme
By 1926, most aspects of production (including industry) return to 1913 levels
Negative Outcomes of the NEP
It failed to provide sufficient income to build new factories
Agriculture grows faster than industry, creating 'scissors crisis'
Corruption and inequality re-emerged; the Nepmen became notorious
Heavy Industry and Transport
The Moscow-Volga Canal was contructed between 1932 and 1937
The Moscow Metro opened in 1935
Industrial output increased by 80% during the fourth Five-Year Plan (1945-50) following the devastation of World War Two
Between 1927 and 1940, production of coal increased from 35.4 million tons per annum to 165.9 million tons per annum
Labour Productivity and Rearmament
Stalin lauched the Stakhanovite movement in 1936, partly because of this electiricity production increased by 51% during 1936-40
By 1940 1/3 of government spending was being devoted to rearmament due to threat of Nazi invasion
By 18952 1/4 of Soviet spending was on the military due to rivalry with the USA (Cold War)
Production Problems
Because of poor planninh and lack of co-ordination between factories, 40% of production was wasted
During the late 1930s economic experts who worked for Gosplan (which managed the 5-Year Plans) were purged
Two major causes of production problems during the Five-Year Plan was:
- Too much focus on quantity and not quality
- Falsifying of production figures
Consumer Goods and the Black Market
Due to shortage of comsumer goods, rationing was introduced between 1928 and 1941
In Leningrad 6,000 people queued for clothes and shoes in 1938
Only 12% of investment went into food production and consumer goods after the war in 1946-53
Housing and Living Conditions
In Liubertsy, there was not a single bathhouse for 650,000 people
During the late 1930s in order to prevent workers from moving from town to town in search of better jobs internal passports were introduced
By 1945, 25 million Soviet people had been made hoemless due to Nzi attacks during World War Two
Advantages of Collectivisation
Ideological:
- Ends private property
- Removes inequality between rich (Kulaks) /poor peasants
- State can distribute grain according to need
Economic:
- State procures more grain for export
- Exports create finance for further industrialisation
- Mechanisation of agriculture
Political:
- Stalin gains support from hard-line communists tired with the NEP
- The State gains more control over its citizens' lives
Disadvantages of Collectivisation
Ideological
- The peasants are not consulted about the process
- Ends the Leninist policy of the NEP
Economic
- Created opposition from peasantry and sabotage of their produce
- Removal of incentives to work = lower grain yields
Political
- The state faced new Civil War against peasant resistance
- The dictatorial nature of the Communist Party beomes all the more obvious
Collectivisation and Communist Ideology
Communists op[posed to private property = creates inquality
During NEP, peasants with large farms had grown wealthier than those with smaller farms
Communist believe collective farms will create a collective mentality
The Politics of Collectivisation
By 1927 Stalin & Bukharin have defeated the United Opposition (Trotsky, Kamenev & Zionoviev); they are expelled from the Party
Trotsky, Kamenev and Zinoviev had advocated forced collectivisation, a popular policy with the left-wing of the Party
By supporting collectivisation Stalin, hoped to gain support from the now leaderless left and outmanoeuvre Bukharin
By 1929 Stalin was undisputed leader
Dekulakisation
Kulak are demonised as wealthier peasants
By 1928 falling grain prices lead peasants to withhold grain; Stalin attacked the 'kulak grain strike'
Grain requisitioning introduced in 1928, ending the NEP
Following peasant resistance, Stalin begins the 'liquidation of the kulaks as a class'
Around 1.5 million peasants are sent to labour camps as a result of the dekulakisation campaign
Human Consequences
Peasants allowed to keep small amount of grain
Rationing reintroduced to cities
Peasant resistance = destruction of 17 million horses and 11 million pigs
Resistance in Ukraine leads to increased grain siezures and government created famine: 5 million die during 1932-3
Economic Consequences
By 1929 the NEP was not producing enough grain for export
Collectivisation: grain production falls but the state acquires a high proportion of produce
Grain procurment increases from 10.8 million tons (1928) to 22.6 million tons (1933); grain exports increase from under 1 million tons (1928) to 5 million (1931)
Small number of remaining private farms produce 410 kilos per hectare; collective farms produce only 320 kilos per hectare
This explains why Red Army rely on US grain imports during WW2
By 1952, grain production reaches pre-war levels
Virgin Lands Scheme & Corn Campaign: Aims & Method
The Vigin Land Scheme was launched in September 1953, the main regions affected were the Northern Caucasus and Kazakhstan
In order to finance the Vigin Land Scheme, between 1954 and 1959 agricultural investments greww from under 3% per year to 12.8% per year
The amount fo farmed land increased between 1953 and 1964 from 18.2 million hectares to 97.4 million hectares
The Corn Campaign was lauched in September 1958 but was only able to produce 50% of corn per hectare in compariosn with the USA
Incentives, Resources and Agricultural Successes
Frarmers' income increased by 250% during 1952-6
By 1955 there was an increase of 40% in the amount of fertiliser being produced
During 1953-8 the production of grain, meat and milk increased. Overall, agricultural production rose by 35.3% in these years
By the end of the 1950sw the income of farm workers had risen by 400% thus helping to consolidate Khrushchevs power
Problems in Agriculture
During the 1950s and 1960s approcimately 44-54% of the Soviet population worked on farms, compared to the 5% in the US
Khrushchev, in 1956, claimed that the USSR would produce more food that the USA by 1960, requiring a 300% increase. In fact, agricultural production increased by 15% during 1958-64
Causes of the slower agricultural growth rates during 1958-64 were the abolition of Machine Tractore Stations and the lack of knwoledge of local conditions
Due largely to Cold War pressures, investment in agriculture fell rapidly, from 12.8% (1954-9) to 2% (1960)
Cold War and Military Spending
During 1955-8 military spening fell from 12.1% of GDP to 9.1%
Professor Gerard DeGroot decribed the period as the 'years of maximum danger'
In 1958-1962 there were three Cold War crises: Taiwan Straits, Cuban Missile and Berlin Wall
In 1962 military spending was increased, so by 1964 it stoop at around 11% of the GDP
Seven-Year Plan & Its Successes
Clothing and agriculture were two sectors of the economy which was expected to benfit from the heavy focus on light industry and chemical production
In 1962 Khrushchev predicted that the USSR would reach the stage of Communism by 1980
Although it fell 5% short of Khrushchev's taget, production of consumer goods increased by 60% during 1959-65
Although, as well, the production opf fertiliser fell 3.5 million tons short of the taget, production did increase by 19 million tons during 1959-65
Seven-Year Plan & Its Problems
Khrushchev's tendency to meddle made it difficult to fulfil that Seven-Year Plan. One of his reforms was the introduction in February 1957 of 105 regional planning agencies known as Sovnarkhoz
Another of Khrushchev's confusing reforms during the Plan was the division of the Party, in February 1962, into two, one half responsible for agriculture and the other half for industry.
Due to Khrushchev's meddling, a joke went around that Khrushchev had replaced the Five-Year Plans not with a Seven-Year Plan but with 'Three Plans a Year'
Becuase the targets were set in wieghts it was a problem that light industry required thin sheet steel rather than thick sheet steel
Restoration of the Economy
Brezhnev agreed with Khrushchev about the importance of consumer goods, but he was less ambitious and wanted stability
He united the Party, ending the division between the industrial and agricultural wing
He also abandoned the Seven-Year Plans. From 1966 the economy returned to the Five-Year Plans
Kosygin's Reforms
The Premier Kosygin was more reform-minded than Brezhnev
He aimed to:
- Cut investment in inefficient collective farms and divert money to light industry
- Give power over production to facotry managers and judge success not by production levels, but by profit
The reforms lasted only from 1965 untill August 1968, due to the Prauge Spring
Increased Military Investment
By the second half of the 1960s the Cold War was in full swing
Brezhnev was determined to achieve nuclear parity with the USA so that embarrasing climb-downs could be avoided
Military spending increased from 11% of GDP in 1964 to 13% in 1970; by 1985 it stood at 17%. In the USA the figure was 6%
This high military spending was a drain on the economy
Developed Socialism
Khrushchev had predicted that the USSR would reach Communism by 1980
Brezhnev relaised this was too optimistic, but was committed to a rising standard of living for a majority of citizens
He developed the idea of 'developed socialism' = job security and low prices
Low prices were guaranteed by importing grain from the West, especially the USA
The 'Second Economy'
State control of the economy under Lenin and STalin meant that there was a long tradition of a black market
Under Stalin, heavy punishments had reduced the black market
However, Brezhnev accepted the black market as a necessary evil to increase access to consumer goods. It became known as the 'second economy'
Andropov's Reforms, 1982-4
Unlike Brezhnev, Andropov acknowledged there were fundamental problems with the Soviet economy
He foucessed on labour discipline:
- Anti-corruption: Brezhnev's Minister of the Interior, Nikilai Schelokov, was put on trial
- Anti-alcohol campaign: Workers' could be sacked for drunkenness
- Operation Trawl: An anti-drunkenness and anti-absenteeism campaign led by the KGB
These measures did not adress the fundamental problems
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Edexcel A Level History Paper 1 (9HI0 1A-1H) - 24th May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- DMU - A Rich and Vibrant History of Improving Lives through Education »
- OCR A-Level History Unit 3 (Y301-Y321) - 24th May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- ocr history y318 russia and its rulers »
- English Literature EPQ Title »
- Edexcel A Level History Paper 2 (9HI0 2A-2H) - 9th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- predictions for Edexcel GCSE history !! »
- Just Chatting »
- Why are young men so different than before? »
- A-level Exam Discussions 2024 »
Comments
No comments have yet been made