Health - Stress - Causes of Stress
Work
Hassles
Lack of Control
- Created by: sian
- Created on: 04-05-11 10:04
Johansson (1978)
Aim: to measure psychological and physiological stress response in 2 categories of employees Method: Quasi-experiment, workers defined at high risk of stress or in a control group. data collected through physiological measures of chemicals in urine & self-report of mood Sample: 24 workers at Swedish sawmill high-risk group-14 workers, job complex & required great knowledge of raw materials. responsible for rate finished objects completed - repsonsible for own & teams wages. control- 10 workers, cleaners or maintenance workers Design: Independent measures. no manipulation of variables Procedure: Daily urine sample - arrival of work and 4 other times throughout day. self-report of mood and alertness, plus caffeine and nicotine consumption Key Results: First Urine Samples of the day, high-risk group had adrenaline levels twice as high as their baseline, continued to increase. control- 1.5 times baseline decreased throughout the day. self-report high-risk felt more rushed & irritated than control and lower well-being Conclusions: Repetitive, machine-paced work, demanding in attention to detail and highly mechanised, contributed to higher stress levels in high-risk group
Johansson (1978)
COGNITIVE/BEHAVIOURIST
Evaluation Points:
- reductionism vs. holism
- individual vs. situational
Method issues:
- socially desirable answers
- can't demonstrate casual relationships because IV can't be manipulated
helps us find explanations for why people are different. useful applications for doctors when diagnosing stress.
small sample, may not be reliable. ignores emotion and free will, ignores extraneous variables of homelife etc.
Kanner (1981)
Aim: compare Hassles and Uplifts scale and Berkman Life Events scale as predictors of psychological symptoms of stress
Method: repeated design - each pps completed both scales
Sample: 100 people who previously completed the survey in 1965. from California mostly white, protestant, adequate or above income. 216 initially contacted, 109 agreed to take part, 9 dropped out
Procedure: All tests sent one month before study began. pps asked to complete Hassles every month for 9 months, life events after 10 months, the HSCH every month for 9 months
Key Results: Hassles consistent from month to month. LIfe events for men correlated positivelly with hassles and negatively with uplifts. women-more life events =more hassles & uplifts. Hassle frequency correlated with positively with psychological symptoms on HSCL
Conclusions: Hassles more powerful predictor of psychological symptoms than life events. Hassles contribute to psychological symptoms whatever life events have happened.
Kanner (1981)
BEHAVIOURIST/ COGNITIVE
Evaluation issues:
- reductionism vs. holism
- individual vs. situational
Method issues:
- socially desirable answers
- may not be realistic or reliable
helps us find explanations for why people are different. useful applications for looking at different stressors in different people
small sample, may not be reliable. ignores emotion and free will, ignores extraneous variables of homelife etc.
Geer and Maisel (1972)
Aim: to see if perceived control or actual control can reduce stress reactions to aversive stimuli Method: Lab experiment, pps shown photos of dead car-crash victims. stress levels measured by galvanic skin response & heart electrodes Sample: 60 undergrads enrolled in a psychology course at New York University Design: Independant design. Group 1-control over how long they saw each photo. Group 2-joined to group 1, warned photos would be 60 secs apart and how long they would see each-no control, knew what would happen. Group 3-joined to group 1, told time to time they would see photos and hear tones, no control, no predictability
Procedure: sound-shielded room wired up to GSR & HR machines. Calibrated for 5 minutes, pps relaxed- baseline measurements taken
Key Results: HR monitors proved inaccurate-data discarded. Group 2 showed most stress to noise. Group 1 experienced less stress to photos than group 2&3
Conclusions: pps showed less GSR reaction=less stress when had control. likely that being able to terminate stimuli reduces stressful impact
Geer and Maisel (1972)
COGNITIVE/BEHAVIOURIST
Evaluation Points:
- reductionism vs. holism
- individual vs. situational
Method Issues:
- low ecological validity, pps may not feel the same in real situation
- sample bias
helps us find explanations for why people are different. useful applications for finding causes of stress and stress levels in specific situations
small sample, may not be reliable. ignores emotion and free will, ignores extraneous variables of homelife etc.
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Postgraduate Msc for clinical psychology »
- MSc Dissertation »
- Social Support, Stress and Mood: A Comparative study of UK students and Nigerian stud »
- Masters help »
- Choosing masters »
- Participants needed!! »
- Assistant Psychology Roles »
- Edexcel A-level Psychology Paper 2 (9PS0 02) - 25th May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- Chartered Occupational Psychologist (BPS).Please help »
- Vaginismus /low sex drive »
Comments
Report