Aim: to investigate whether hearing from expert witness which casts doubt on the accuracy of eyewitness testimony would affect a jury's decision
Method: Lab experiment using videotaped mock trial
Sample: 538 undergraduates given extra credit for introductory psychology course
Procedure: viewed videotape, answered questionnaire: verdict, memory test, confidence rating scale. IV's were: witnessing identifying conditions (poor-robber seen, weapon shown), witness confidence, form of testimony, expert opinion
Key Results: juror verdicts: when WIC good, more guilty verdicts, effect increased if witness had given descriptive testimony. juror memory: 85% pps correctly recalled-memory cannot be blamed for judgement. juror confidence: under good WIC, more confident effect stronger if heard expert witness and if witness 100% confident
Conclusions: expert testimony improved jurors knowledge & made them pay more attention to WIC
Comments
No comments have yet been made