Forensic Linguistics

?

The Law and Speech Sounds

  • Forensic tasks of the phonetician 
    • Speaker identification 
    • Determination of unclear or contested utterances 
    • Authenticity examinations of audio recordings 
    • Speaker profiling 
    • Evaluation of speaker recognition evidence given by law witnesses 
  • Forensic speaker comparison 
    • Began in early 1960s 
    • Courts feel a need to identify speakers in audio recordings
    • Two approaches: 
      • Acoustic Analysis
        • Voiceprint
        • Voicegram
        • Spectograms 
      • Auditory Phonetic Analysis 
        • Analysis by ear 
        • Trained phonetician 
    • Both approaches were used to compare recordings of contested utterances known suspects 
1 of 8

Acoustic Analysis

  • Two underlying assumptions 
    • Different spectogram renderings of the same word or sound from one individual would be similar to each other 
    • Different spectogram renderings of the same word or sound from different individuals would be different from each other 
  • Problems 
    • Intra-speaker variability 
    • Inter-speaker similarity 
    • Significant or diagnostic similarities or differences 
    • Over-zealous application 
2 of 8

Auditory Analysis

  • Procedures
    • Phoneticians listening to and making notes on speech patterns in disputed and known recordings 
    • Auditory impressions were compared using a range of segmental and prosodic dimensions 
  • Problems 
    • No serious attempts to explain its basis in the academic of professional literature until very recently 
    • Acoustically different data may create similar auditory impressions 
3 of 8

Joint Auditory and Acoustic Approach

  • Auditory-phonetic examinations
    • Segmental features 
    • Pitch, rhythmical and fluency features 
    • Voice quality
  • Acoustic-phonetic examinations
    • Spectographic analysis 
    • Energy-frequency domain examinations 
    • Time domain examinations 
  • Fundamental frequency examinations 
    • Creak transition points 
    • Intonation
    • Jitter estimation 
4 of 8

Limitations of Forensic Phonetic Evidence on Speak

  • Speaker identity cannot currently be established with total certainty 
  • Influences on speech production:
    • Deliberate voice disguise 
    • Tiredness
    • Illness
    • Intoxication
    • Psychological states 
    • Changes in the communicative situation 
  • Phonetician must be able to appraise the differences found using casework, experience and relevant research 
  • If the proof of guilt is beyond reasonable doubt, it follows that forensic speaker identification is not a basis for conviction; an expert can only offer an opinion 
  • The International Association of Forensic Phonetics has a Code of Practice to prevent experts over stating their opinions 
5 of 8

Speaker Profiling

  • Series of violent assaults on women 
  • Began in July 1975
  • First murder in October 1975
  • By April 1979 - 10 women murdered 
  • Mainly Leeds and Bradford 
  • Few normal forensic clues 
  • People terrified to leave their homes 
  • Crimes attributed to one man
  • Yorkshire Ripper 
6 of 8

Forensic Phonetic Work

  • Authentication
    • Evidence of tape tampering is sought by a variety of means 
    • Each case presents slightly different problems
    • Depends on: 
      • The nature of the speech materials and recording 
      • The specific instructions accompanying the material 
  • Determination of unclear or contested utterances 
    • Contacted by Met Police to: 
      • Help in the investigation 
      • Provide an expert opinion 
  • Earwitness Testimony 
    • Ear Witnesses
      • Neglected area 
      • Number of investigators are adamant in their opinion that voice parades are an adequate or inappropriate approach to speaker identification 
7 of 8

Earwitness Testimony

  • Influences on the perceptual identification task
    • Familiarity 
    • Reinforcement 
    • Sample size
    • Recording quality 
    • Performance of listener 
    • Training of listener 
    • Number of talkers 
    • Signal quality 
  • Guidelines for voice lineups 
    • Parity 
    • Personnel 
    • Records 
    • Witnesses
    • Instructions 
    • Mock tests 
    • Samples 
    • Foil takers 
    • Recordings, Presentation, Feedback, Impartiality 
8 of 8

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar English Language resources:

See all English Language resources »See all Forensic Phonetics resources »