Five-Year Plans

Stalin's Russia

HideShow resource information

Ideological causes of the First Five-Year Plan

  • Believed that socialism was only possible in a highly-advanced industrialised nation
  • Communist revolution took place in an economically backward country
  • Russia was around 100 years behind western advanced economy
  • Set the agenda - 'in ten years at most we must make good the distance which separates us from the advanced capitalist countries'
  • Believed that revolution should serve working class
  • Peasants had prospered whilst working conditions slowly improved under the NEP - Stalin aimed to change this
  • Wanted to replace 'burgious specialists' with 'red specialists'
1 of 12

Economical causes of the First Five-Year Plan

  • Response to failure of the NEP
  • NEP could only industrialise country at a 'snail's pace'
  • Amount of materials produced during NEP years were never more than produced during Tsarism
  • Improvements in production still left Russia behind Germany and France
  • New approach was needed
2 of 12

Political causes of the First Five-Year Plan

  • Belief of 'crash industrialisation' was inspired by collectivisation successes
  • Evidence that Stalin was no longer content as Lenin's pupil
  • Wanted reputation that surpassed Lenin
  • Gave speech on Lenin's mistakes
  • 'Russia of the NEP' was over and 'Stalin's Russia' was beginning 
  • Concerned that Russia was unable to defend itself in a war
  • Decided that Russia would need to mass-develop iron, steel, oil and coal industries on a very large scale because they were vital for war
3 of 12

Priorities and rationales of the Second Five-Year

  • Improvement in living standards for workers - poor living standards were having poor effects on health
  • Grow industries even more - develop new materials 
  • Set high labour performance expectations - officials realised that labour productivity was low
  • More conciliatory approach to peasants - there was a threat of war and Russia needed all support
  • Diverted production funds - threat of war
4 of 12

Priorities and rationales of the Third Five-Year P

  • Increase of military goods - preparation for war
  • Discipline labour workers - increase production rates
  • Restricted workers in changing jobs - workers were constantly changing jobs for better conditions and pay
  • Limited amount of time peasants were to spend on private land - government wanted to regain control over peasants
5 of 12

Successes, failures and priorities of the First Fi

Successes

  • Production increase in iron, steel, coal and oil
  • Peasants moved to cities
  • Economy grew by 14% per year
  • Education was more reformed and accessible

Failures

  • Never met targets
  • 'Command economy'
  • Demoted or sacked those who failed to meet targets
  • Unrealistic and impossible in many ways

Priorities

  • Increase production
6 of 12

Successes, failures and priorities of the Second F

Successes

  • Increased production pace
  • Raw material production expanded
  • Transport improved
  • Rationing ended
  • Peasants were given small land plots for private farming
  • Russia recovered from famine

Failures

  • No improvement in living standards
  • Resources in short supply
  • Low quality goods were relied on
  • Housing shortages and issues
  • Social inequalities

Priorities

  • Improve workers' living standards
  • Grow industries
  • Set high labour performance expectations
7 of 12

Successes, failures and priorities of the Third Fi

Successes

  • Peasants promoted to admin and management posts
  • Living conditions improved
  • Russia became more powerful

Failures

  • Many industrial managers were removed and executed
  • Moderates who offered creative solutions to issues were removed
  • Labour productivity did not increase
  • Workers were not motivated

Priorities

  • Increase production of military goods
  • Discipline workers
  • Restrict workers in changing jobs
8 of 12

How was education reformed to aid Russia's economi

  • Children and young people were encouraged to challenge authorities of parents and teachers
  • Parents were expected to teach children to respect the Soviet government
  • New curriculum was introduced with a series of textbooks
  • Core subjects were set out
  • Homework was to be set regularly
  • National examinations were brought in
  • Discipline was designed to prepare children for regulation of workplace under Five-Year Plans
  • Teaching and learning in Russia were influenced by Five-Year Plan methods
  • State spending on education was reduced to free up resources for Five-Year Plans
  • Communist Party and trade unions offered grants and scholarships
9 of 12

Evidence that women had greater opportunities in S

  • Women were entering the workforce
  • Number of women employed in industry grew rapidly
  • Women made up almost half a workforce in some places
  • Soviet authorities recognised important contribution from women
  • 80% of farm workers were women 
  • Women were represented in countryside Stakhanovite movement 
  • Most celebrated Stakhanovites were women - Pasha Angelina was recognised as the organiser of the First Women's Tractor Brigade and Maria Demchanko pledged to harvest four times average sugar beet yield
10 of 12

Evidence that women had limited opportunities in S

  • Zhenotdel was closed down in the 1930s
  • Communist Party paid little attention to role of women on assumption that men and women were equal
  • Traditional gender roles were reasserted
  • Women were paid less than men
  • Women were sentenced to two years in jail for having an abortion
  • Women who had abortions that were not to save their lives were considered 'undeserving'
  • Women were still expected to be responsible for household chores and childcare
  • Wives of Party officials were expected to manage a 'well-ordered Communist home' and not work
  • Female Party members were encouraged to do their duties at home
  • Wives of Party officials were expected to be part of 'wife activist movement' 
  • Members of the movement were expected to be 'ideal mothers'
11 of 12

Family and relationships under Stalin

  • The 'Great Retreat' was the term used to describe the mid-1930s where gender roles and sexual attitudes were re-implemented
  • Family policy was promoted using Soviet propaganda by publicising Stalin's faithfullness to his family - he visited his mother and showed faithfulness to his wife who committed suicide - this was in hope that the people of Russia would follow his example
  • Soviet authorities seeked to promote marriage because they saw it as highly important, especially within the party - it was considered to be 'glamorous' and gained married couples and their families various bonuses
  • Marriage was encouraged by introducing marriage certificates and wedding rings 
  • Married Party members were given perks such as spacious accommodation, their own holiday homes and opportunities to take their families to Party holiday resorts
  • Divorce was discouraged by making the cost very high and failing to meet divorce laws resulted in two years' imprisonment
12 of 12

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar History resources:

See all History resources »See all Russia - 19th and 20th century resources »