Ethnicity, Crime & Justice

?

Ethnicity & Criminalisation

3 main sources of statistics on ethnicity & criminalisation:

Official Statistics

  • Show the likelihood of being involved in the CJS

Victim Surveys

  • Ask individuals what crimes they have been victims of
  • May ask the respondent to identify the ethnicity of the person who committed the crime

Self-report Studies

  • They ask individuals to disclose what crimes they have committed

Overall, the evidence on ethnicity & offending is inconsistent. Official statistics & victim surveys indicate higher rates of offending by black people, but self-report studies do not.

1 of 5

Racism & the CJS

Policing

  • Stop & search, excessive surveillance, armed raids, police violence & deaths in custody
  • Minorities are more likely to think that they are over-policed & under-protected

Stop & search

  • Black people are 7x more likely to be stopped & searched than whites
  • Asians are 3x more likely to be stopped & searched than other people
  • Patterns as a result in ethnic differences in offending; police racism & demographic factors

Arrests & cautions

  • The arrest rate for black people is over 3x the rate for whites
  • Blacks & Asians are less likely than white people to receive a caution
2 of 5

Racism & the CJS 2

Prosecution & Trial

  • CPS is more likely to drop cases against minorities than against whites. Black & Asian defendants are less likely to be found guilty than whites

Sentencing & Prison

  • Black men 5x more likely to be jailed, even when the seriousness of the offence & previous convictions are taken into account
  • Ethnic minorities are less likely to be granted bail
3 of 5

Left Realism

Lea & Young: Crime Statistics

  • Crime is a result of relative deprivation, subculture & marginalisation
  • Racism has led to the marginalisation & economic exclusion of ethnic minorities
  • Media emphasis on consumerism promotes relative deprivation by setting goals that some members of society cannot reach
  • Police racism has an impact on the unjustified criminalisation of some ethnic groups, but this cannot have a large enough impac to suggest statistical differences, nor the difference is conviction rates between blacks and Asians

Lea & Young thus conclude that:

  • The statistics represent real differences in offending between ethnic groups
  • These are caused by differences in levels of relative deprivation & marginalisation
4 of 5

Neo-Marxism: Black Crime as a Construct

Gillroy: The Myth of Black Criminality

  • The CJS acts of racist stereotypes, so minoritis are criminalised & therefore appear in greater numbers in the official crime statistics
  • Ethnic minority crime is a form of political resistance against a racist society, and this resistance has its roots in the struggle against British imperialism

Hall et al: Policing the Crisis

  • The 1970s moral panaic over black "muggers" that served the interests of capitalism in dealing with the crisis
  • In times of crisis, rule by consent becomes more difficult (e.g. 1970s economic crisis - high unemployment, inflation & strikes)
  • Media-driven moral panic about the supposed growth of mugging
  • The myth about the young black mugger served as a scapegoat to distract society from the economic crisis
  • The moral panic served to divide the w/c on racial grounds & weaken opposition to capitalism, as well as providing popular consent for more authoritarian rule
  • However, black people were also marginalised through unemployment, and ths drove some into petty crime to survive
5 of 5

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Crime and deviance resources »