Utilitarians argue for the greatest happiness, but contraception leading to sexual freedom is not necessarily the highest good as we cannot predict the consequences. On the other hand, a utilitarian would argue that humans will have sex no matter what, hence contraceptives must be available to avoid seriously damaging consequences, such as too many unwanted children or the spread of disease. Contraception can also provide for couples who want to limit the number of children they can support and educate without sacrificing the unitive element of their marriage.
Singer argues for using contraception to stop population growth, even suggesting that aid to developing countries should be made conditional on the use of contraceptives
Evaluation:
- Some see the opportunities that contraception vies to institutions as interfering with a basic right of every human being to reproduce - e.g. China's one-child policy
- The domination of the majority gives no protection for minorities
Comments
No comments have yet been made