Edexcel R.E Rights and Responsibilities
Religion and Society
- Created by: ellen lomasney
- Created on: 07-05-12 14:09
Authority of the Bible
Some Christians use the Bible when making moral decisions
- The Bible is the word of God and so had absolute authority and would ensure approval on judgement day
'God is the author of sacred scripture'
- The Bible gives clear guidance on how to behave
the decalogue - ' thou shall not commit murder'
- The Bible contains teachings of Jesus, Jesus is the Son of God and so should be followed
' love your neighbour'
- the Bible contains letters from leading disciples who knew Jesus and were guided by the Holy Spirit
Authority of the Bible
Some Christians Don't use the Bible
- The Bible is only inspired by God
- The Bible reflects socail situations at the time
St pauls attitude to women - ' let the women be silent in the churches'
- The Bible needs to be interpreted by the Church
- Some Christians use their conscience if it is a personal problem
' we must obey the judgement of our conscience'
Authority of the Church
Some Christians use the Church when maknig moral decisions
- The Church is the body of Christ and so has the same authority
'in christ we who are many form one body'
- God speaks through the Church and the Church is guided by God
- The Church ensures no differences in opinion so Chrisitans are sure they are doing the right thing
- The Church is an important part of Christian life and so give appropriate guidance
Authority of the Church
Some Christians Don't use the Church
- The Church doesn't come directly from God
- St Paul said you should follow you conscience even is it says the Church is wrong
- Jesus used situation ethics instead of following some of the rules of the Church
Jesus healed on the sabbath
- The Bible has clear teachings on behaviour
the decalogue
Conscience
Some Christians use their conscience when making moral decisions
- The conscience is the voice of God
- The Church says you should follow your conscience as the voice of God
' we must be sure we have a clear conscience'
- St Paul said it should be the final stage in decision making and be followed even if its against the church
'we must obey the judgement of our conscience'
- The Church and Bible don't come directly from God
Conscience
Some Chrisitans don't use their conscience
- People mistake it
e.g. the yorkshire ripper thought God was telling him to kill prostitiutes
- decisions are too private leading to a difference in opinion
- The Bible and Church are followed by other ans so Christians agree on what is the best thing to do
- If people followed their conscience no-one would know what sort of behaviour to expect from eachc other and society would be chaotic
Situation ethics
Some Chirstians use situation ethics when making moral decisions
- Jesus used situation ethics
jesus healed on the sabbath instead of following the old testament
- Christians think it is wwrong to ignore the consequences of actions
- Jesus said the most important commandments were love God and love your neighbour and so you should do whats the most loving thing to do
- Christianity is a religion of love and so you should base decisions on love
Situation ethics
Some Christians don't use situation ethics
- God would have given laws e.g. the decalogue for them not to be followed
- It is better to follow the decalogue and the dermon on the mount than to use purely your own ideas
- The Church knows what Chrisitans should do better that individual Chrisitans
- Situation ethics is based on finding the best consequences and you can never know all the consequences
Different authorites
Protestants
- Usually use the Bible as it is Straightforward however with complicated issues like contraception they use their conscience and the Church
Catholics
- usually use the Church as it applies bible teachings however for contraception they use situation ethics and conscience
Some Chirsitans
- usually follow conscience however if conscience went against clear teaching they use the Church
Some chirsitans
- usually use situation ethics however is they don't know all the consequences they will use the Bible or the Church
Human rights
In 1998 the Uk human rights act gave
- the right to life
- the right to freedom from torture
- the right to a fair trial
- the right to freedom of expression and religion
- the right to marry anyone
- the right to an education
- the right to vote in a free election
if any of these rights are abused you can go to court
Arguments for Human rights
- Without the right to a fair trial innocent people would be locked up and we would live in a dictatorship because all opposition leaders would be imprisoned
- Without freedom of thought and expression minority politcal parties and religious groups could be banned
- Without the right to vote there would be no democracy
Arguments against Human rights
- People abuse human rights
e.g. prisoners claim their punishment is against human rights
- in a democracy you vote for laws and rights and so some specialist rights are not needed
- some people think you should torture terrorists to find out their plans and save innocent lives
Why are Human rights improtant to Christians
- The right to life is a basic Christian belief as life is holy and belongs to God
sancity of life
- everyone is made in the image of God and so everyone should be treaed fairly and equally
- freedom of expression if vital to Christian life as they need to meet to worhship and for festivals e.g. christmas and easter
- rights ensure Chrisitans are not discriminated against for example in the work place
Why are human rights problematic to Chrisitans
- some Chrisitans are against civil partnerships as it is against Gods will
' you should not lie with another man as you lie with a woman'
- some Christains believe you must only marry christians to bring your children up christian
- some Christians are against gay adoption as they think a child should be raised by a mother and father
- The Catholic Church is against womans rights as they do not allow women to be priests
Why should you take part in democracy
- It gives you control over issues e.g. tax, education, healthcare
- your ancestors fought for the right to vote and the only was to respect this is to vote
- small amounts of people voting could lead to minority extreamist groups getting into power
- democracy means government of the people so it must be improtant to vote to sustain democracy
Why shouldn't you take part in democracy
- one vote makes no difference on the outcome as there are 60 million people in the UK
- it doesn't matter who is voted in as they have to follow the rules of the EU
- mostly no changes can be made as the government has to work within economic restrictions
- politians may lie and be corrupt and so are not worth voting for
Why Christians should take part in democracy
- the Golden rule - Christians put themselves in the position of those who will be affected by the law as think of what they would want
- the Parable of the sheap and goats - Christians should help the sick , hungry and homeless as if they were Jesus and so Chrisitans think of the effects a policy will have on the sick and homeless
- teachings on being your brothers keeper shows that christians have a duty to look after everyone in need
- Chrisitanity is a religion of love and so christians should vote to ensure the most loving consequences are produced
Why Chrisitans shouldn't take part in democracy
- Jesus said the most important commandment is to love God andthis is more important than electoral processes
- Going to mass every sunday is more important than electoral processess
- loving God and politics shouldn't mix
Arguments for genetic engineering
- It offers cures for incurable diseases
- It is done in other countries so is avalible for those who pay for it
- cloning using animal cells doesn't involve loss of human life
- Genetic research is closely monitored by law
Arguments against Genetic engineering
- There is little information about long term consequences
- If anything was to go wrong it would be permenant
- It gives too much power to scientists
- It treats the human body no different to plants
Christian attitudes to Genetic engineering
Liberal Chrisitans - agree
- Jesus showed Christians should do all they can to cure disease (heal the sick)
- Genetic cures are just like drug cures
- There is a big difference between creating cells and creating people
- Embryos are not feotuses until they are 14 days old
Roman catholics - Not with embryos
- life begins at conception and killing is wrong
- against sancity of life
- unatural and produced by masturbation
Some Christians - against all
- we have no right to interfere with Gods plan
- it is playing God which is a great sin
- it is wrong to make earth perfect as only heaven can be perfect
Related discussions on The Student Room
- AS level science exams »
- ial edexcel chem or bio »
- History coursework advice »
- AQA or Edexcel for A-Level Business »
- Edexcel A Level Politics Paper 3 (9PL0 3A/3B) - 14th June 2024 [Exam Chat] »
- Edexcel A Level Politics Paper 2 (9PL0 02) - 5th June 2024 [Exam Chat] »
- A2 study buddy? »
- Edexcel vs AQA (Physics) »
- Edexcel A level biology: why do they always include content that is out of spec?? »
- Aqa a level econ »
Comments
Report
Report
Report
Report