Developmental Approach
- Created by: Lou
- Created on: 09-01-13 07:48
Attachment
Attachment - Strong emotional bond, an emotional relationship between infants and their caregivers.
- seeking proximity
- distress on separation
- joy on reunion
Bond - One sided relationship e.g tom loves his cat but feelings are not returned
Q. What is 'attachment'?
Theories
Social Learning Theory
Operant Conditioning (Skinner Box)
- +/- reinforcement
- baby cries
- parent = -ve reinforcement
- baby = +ve reinforcement
Classical Conditioning (Pavlov's Dogs)
- association
- baby see's parent = food + comfort = pleasure
- parent see's baby = love + feelings of need = pleasure
+ explains social releases
- can't generalise (study on animals)
+research supporting
Theories
Evolutionary
Bowlby
- innate = survival
- imprinting (+ Konrad Lorenz)
- only one care giver, monotropy (+ Konrad Lorenz)
- continuity hypothesis (infant attachment to later attachment)
- first 3 years is critical period to form attachment
- attachement = safe base
+ explains early behaviour
+ research supporting
- evidence against monotropy
- ignores fathers role
Theories
Skinner Box - Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement - reward increases the behaviour it follows
- positive: pleasant stimulus is presented
- negative: an unpleasant stimulus is removed
- punishment: decreases the behaviour it follows
Skinner worked on rats and pigeons to show that behaviour is learnt through reward and punishment.
The rat is placed into a cage with an electric shock floor. When the rat does something that is not wanted it will be negatively reinforced by the electric shock. It is positively reinforced by learning that to press the lever will gain food pellets.
Supporting social learning theory
Theories
Pavlov's Dogs - Classical Conditioning
- associating with a stimulus
Pavlov taught his dogs to associate the sound of the bell ringing to food so they started to salivate. Even when no food was around just the sound of the bell made the dogs salivate showing the association between the two.
Supporting social learning theory
Theories
Konrad Lorenz
Lorenz took half of a geese's eggs, at hatching time Lorenz made sure that he was the first large moving object the the geese would see. Lorenz found that the goslings formed a rapid attachment to him and followed him around as if he was their mother. He then put his goslings with the naturally hatched goslings, they quickly split into two groups looking for own 'mother'.
Lorenz said this was due to imprinting, (to form an attachment to the first large moving object at birth)
Supporting the evolutionary theory
Theories
Harlow's Monkey's
The baby monkey had to fake figure mothers, one wire for food, and the other just soft fur for comfort. They found that the baby stayed with the comfort mother and just left when wanting food, suggesting that comfort is also needed not just food for survival.
Also goes against the idea of monotropy. Monkeys who had no mother but grew up together had no signs of social or emotional disturbance, though they had no primary caregiver they seemed to attach to each other instead.
Goes against evolutionary theory
Types of Attachments
Ainsworth Strange Situation
Looking at separation anxiety and stranger distress
8 situations:
- mum + baby
- mum + baby +stranger
- mum + baby + stranger (tries to play with infant)
- baby + stranger (comforts if needed)
- mum + baby
- baby
- baby + stranger
- mum + baby
Types of Attachments
Ainsworth Strange Situation
- Secure:
- content with mother
- cries attachment leaves
- happy on return
- Insecure-avoidant:
- ignored mother
- didn't mind if mother left
- stranger could comfort
- Insecure-resistant:
- uneasy around mother
- upset when left
- resisted strangers
- hard to comfort on mothers return
+ observational - westernised
+ big sample size - unfamiliar setting
Cultural Variation
Some cultural differences are found, though may be how the country value independancy such as Germany where insecure aviodant is seen as a good thing.
Fox
- Israeli babies. Looked after by nursery, see parents once a week. Insecure resistant
Trovick
- African tribes, no variation between or America and England
Cultural Variation
Van Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg
- meta-analysis of 32 strange situation studies in multiple countries
- the percentages of children classified as secure and insecure were very similar across the countries tested
- secure attachments were the most common type of attachment
- Western countries there were more insecure avoidant than resistant
- Non-western had more insecure resistant than avoidant
Disruption to Attachment
Privation
- no attachment ever
- Genie 11 years alone in room only contact when getting food + water once a day, they did not recover
- Czech twins, 7 years in isolation, they recovered
Disruption to Attachment
Separation
- attachment broken for a short period of time
- John, care for 9 days
- protest, dispair, detachment
Disruption to Attachment
Institutionalisation
- care but no attachement formed
- Rutter
- longitudinal study in orphanage
- stayed = distrupted, trouble, aggressive
- back to parents = aggressive, bad attachment
- adopted = secure
- Tizard and Hodges
- Romanian orphans + UK orphans compared
- Romanian when joined were weak and poor cognitive ability but when adopted quickly caught up with the UK
Day Care
4 Types:
- informal (family)
- nurseries
- nannnies
- day care centre
Social Affects
- Campbell
- informal = +language skills
- nurseries = +social skills
Good day care
- good staff training
- good space
- toys and activities
- low staff to child ratio
- low staff turnover
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Oxford PPL vs Cambridge PBS? »
- Psychology degrees »
- Developmental psychology exam »
- OCR Areas of psychology PREDICTIONS??!!?!? »
- Leeds arts uni portfolio »
- Graphic Design Portfolio »
- Oxford PPL vs Cambridge PBS? »
- PPL or EP? »
- Do you learn to read people's minds when studying psychology? »
- Analyse how the legacy of previous approaches may affect current service deliver »
Comments
No comments have yet been made