Deontology - Kant
- Created by: Maegan
- Created on: 04-06-13 15:59
Paragraph 1
Kant - Pietist Christian - Philosopher Enlightenment (18th cent) believed in emphasis of duty & valued reason
Deontological - actions - intrinsic value - consequence of action do not affect moral value
Deon - Greek - duty - teaches - do / avoid particular actions
Absolutist - no exceptions
A priori - opposite of telelogical
Paragraph 2
Demonstrate - laws of nature and morality - grounded in human reason alone
Our innate human reason, it alone - formulate moral statements and solutions
Autonomous - self law
Reason - know our duty - must follow it
Quote: "impossible to conceieve of anything in this world, or even out of it, which can be taken as good qualification except good will"
We exercise good will with others - put others needs first - good will is good in its self
Linked good will and duty - to have good will is to do ones duty
Human reason - recognise moral imperatives - do good and avoid evil
We must do right thing for right reason - not for pleasure etc...
Paragraph 3
Kantian ethics - based on categorical imperatives
Categorical imperatives - moral commands - absolute
Opposite - hypothetical imperatives - Kant sees as immoral - followed because of the conseqeunce they achieve
Categorical - circumstance is not important as same action should be applied in all similar circumstances
Hypothetical - subjective and relative - ethical obligations relative to situation & without objective moral content
Paragraph 4
Categorical imperatives - four formulations
1) Formula Universal Law: act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law
- Means: all moral laws should be applied universally - all rational beings and similar situaitons. If an action is right for ___ it is right for ___. Therefore acting on same principle of action.
Paragraph 4 (cont)
Kant created Universalisability test - allow moral agents decide whether a maxim can be universalised or not.
1) Find agents maxim
2) Imagine possible world - everyone in similar position - followed maxim
3) Decide whether in contradictions/irrationalities arise due to this maxim
4) Contradictions/irrationalities arise = acting on maxim not allowed in real world
5) No contradictions = acting on maxim - permissible & some instances required
Two types contradictions
1) Conception - maxim contradicts self / existing law of nature
2) Vollition - logically applied but as rational being does not make sense to
E.g. Person breaks a promise = all promises can be broken
Paragraph 5
2) Formula of humanity: act in such a way that you always treat humanity whether in your own person or in the person of someone else, never simply as a means to an end but always at the same time as an end
- Means: never treat another human being for the sole purpose of our own
Also never use human being to satisfy own needs - must honour and respect others
Paragraph 6
3) Formula - Kingdom of ends: every rational being must so act as if he were through his maxims always a law-making member in the universal kingdom of ends
- Means: moral choices should be made fee & free of autonmous beings - intention should be act only on maxims that conform to principles of categorical imperative
4) Formula of autonomy
- Means: moral decisions should be a free choice
By use of reason people can formulate moral laws for themselves
AO2 Strengths and weaknesses (1)
Universal law
Weakness: does not permit lying - sometimes tempting to lie - murder example (looking for victim) - could've aided death
However...
Strength: Kant - always causes harm to lie - a universalisation of law 'I can lie under certain circumstances if morally unacceptable'
AO2 Strengths and weaknesses (2)
Formula of ends
Weakness: interpreted as wrong to use services of GP & hairdressers
- technically treating others for 'sole purpose of our own'
- different - way out world works today
- needs to specify - avoid contradictions
However...
Strength: acting according to this principle - person accepts freely they are autonomous agent acting according to their duty
AO2 Strengths and weaknesses (3)
Good will
Weakness: acting out of good will - sometimes lead to disaster
E.g. giving money to homeless - depressed - uses money to buy drugs - overdoses = disaster
Not always good outcomes
AO2 Strengths and weaknesses (4)
Cold and unnatractive
Weakness: not practical - barely shows emotions of what is morally right / wrong
However...
Strength: shows danger - acting on emotions to determine right from wrong
- same situation could have various outcomes depending on emotion
- anger/sadness - disaster?
My conclusion
- Theory doesn't work
- Adjustments needed e.g. lying example
- Agree - we act on emotions a lot of time specially anger / sadness - Kant's theory prevents this
- However we are humans - unnatural to live without emotions therefore theory doesn't work
Extra
Teleological theory - better - each situation is realtive and judged on its own merit
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Edexcel A-level Religious Studies Paper 1 (9RS0 01) - 12th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- OCR A-Level Religious Studies Paper 2 (H573/02) 19th June 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- OCR A-level Religious Studies Paper 2 (H573/02) - 17th June 2024 [Exam Chat] »
- Edexcel A-Level Religious Studies June 12,19,26th »
- AQA A Level Philosophy Paper 1 + 2 (7172/1+2) 18th and 26th May 2023 [Exam Chat] »
- OCR religious studies Kantian ethics question »
- scared for Philosophy A level »
- AQA A-level Religious Studies 1 (7062/1) 12 Jun & 2 (7062/2A-2E) 19 Jun [Exam Chat] »
- AQA A Level Philosophy Paper 1 7172/1 - 19 May 2022 [Exam Chat] »
- What does it mean that the PM is hindu? »
Comments
No comments have yet been made