A diagnosis can be considered valid if: People who share the same symptoms are given the same diagnosis.The symptoms of the patient match those considered to be present for that disorder. A client diagnosed with SZ should have at least 2 symptoms continuously for at least 2 months or the diagnosis does not fit the necessary criteria so lacks validity.
A diagnosis can have 3 types of validity:
Etiological validity: A group of people diagnosed with the same disorder will have the same factors causing it e.g if SZ is caused by excess dopamine then all SZ's should have excess dopamine
Concurrent Validity: Symptoms that are part of the disorder but are not part of the diagnosis should be found in those diagnosed e.g SZ's often have relationship problems, but this is not a characteristic for diagnosis
Predicative Validity: A diagnosis should lead to a prediction of future behaviours: recovery, development and effect of treatment. E.g if a drug that is effective for SZ, someone diagnosed should respond to the treatment
Comments
No comments have yet been made