Rather than defining religion in terms od specific kinds of belief, functional defintitions define it in terms of the social or psychological functions it performs for individuals or society.
For example, Durkheim (1915) defines religion in terms of the contribution it makes to social integration, rather than any specific belief in God or the supernatural.
Another functionalist, Milton Yinger (1970) identifies functions that religion performs for individuals, such as answering 'ultimate questions' about thr meaning of life and what happens when we die.
An advantage of the functional defintions is that they are inclusive - allowing us to include a wide range of beliefs and practices that perform functions such as intergration. Also, since they do not specify belief in God or the supernatural, there is no bias agianst non-Western religions such as Buddhism. However, just because an institution helps integrates individuals into groups, this does not make it a religion. For example, collective collective chanting at fottball matches might give individuals a sense of intergration, but this does not make it a religion
Comments
No comments have yet been made