debates
- Created by: charlbocharl
- Created on: 04-05-17 13:27
nature nurture
Possible nature studies: Biological area studies
Possible nurture studies: Behaviourist studies
Strengths
-
application for nature eg. medication
-
application for nurture
-
Considering behaviour from only a nature view can lead to scientific methods
-
Only considering nature or nurture is reductionist
Weaknesses
-
Reductionist and ignores other possible explanations for behaviour
-
The scientific methods used by a nature approach means - low in ecological validity
- Claiming behaviour is due to either one can mean ethical issues
freewill/determinism
Free will examples: Milgram (shocks), Bocchiaro (whistle blowing) Lee
Deterministic examples: Hancock, Casey, L+p, Kohlberg, Bandura
Strengths for free will
-
offers opportunities for managing behaviour
-
allows learning experiences to be designed to encourage desired behaviour
-
A deterministic explanation can be difficult to change.
Weaknesses
-
Reductionist and ignores possible deterministic factors
-
Often expensive to make appropriate environmental changes
-
Sometimes a deterministic explanation is more valid than a freewill explanation
reducution/holism
Reductionist studies: Biological area studies, Behaviourist studies
Holist studies: Lee, Freud, Piliavin
Strengths of reductionist
-
Focusing on one explanation for behaviours can lead to effective treatments
-
A reductionist approach tend to result in very scientific methods
-
Being reductionist can help explain a specific aspect of behaviour
-
Tends to gather objective quantitative data
Weaknesses
-
Focusing on one explanation for behaviour can mean you ignore other explanations
-
Taking such a scientific view means you miss the rich detail of qualitative methods
-
A holistic view can sometimes be the best explanation for a behaviour
- Taking such a scientific view means research could be considered low in ecological validity.
individual/situational
individual studies: Kohlberg, Piliavin, Levine, Milgram (shocks)
Situational studies: Lee, Chaney, Milgram (shocks), bocchiaro
Strengths for situational
-
Useful bc it offers opportunities for managing behaviour
-
Allows change in the environment to be made to reduce anti-social/enhance pro-social behaviour
-
An individual explanation can be difficult to change
Possible weaknesses of situational
-
Reductionist and ignores possible individual factors
-
Is often expensive to make appropriate environmental changes
- Sometimes an individual explanation is more valid than a situational one.
usefullness of research
Benefits considering studies as useful
-
Knowledge that can benefit society
-
Practical applications
-
psych as a science
-
Useful research will promote the subject and encourage more pps to take part in research.
Possible problems
-
Research not deemed useful could damage the reputation of psychology
-
could have funding implications for future research
-
Some research is criticised for unethical nature meaning it is less useful and would be difficult to replicate.
ethical considerations
Informed Consent, Debrief, Protection of Participants, Deception, Confidentiality, Withdrawal from an Investigation
Unethical studies: Milgram (shocks), Bandura (bobo doll), Piliavin, B and c (cats)
Strengths of breaking ethics
-
Deception may be used to make a situation appear more realistic - higher ecological validity.
-
Pps may not be informed they are being studied - more natural behaviour
-
The ends justify the mens
-
Researcher may need to break confidentiality when a pp needs to be identified so they can receive support
Weaknesses of breaking ethics
-
may experience physical/psychological harm
-
May be more difficult to replicate the study if ethical principles are not upheld
- Can damage the rep of psychology
socially sensitive research
Socially sensitive studies: Hancock, Milgram (shocks), Gould, Casey, Freud (hanz)Baron-cohen (autism)
Strengths of conducting socially sensitive research
-
Can be useful/has practical application
-
Gain vulnerable insight into human behaviour
-
Can establish patterns of behaviour that could prevent future atrocities/immoral acts
-
Studies deviant behaviour which is beneficial in establishing abnormality from normality
Weaknesses
-
Ethical issues may be raised
-
May be difficult to replicate due to its sensitive nature
-
Findings could lead to discrimination against groups of people/individuals
- Could be used to shape public policy in an unfair way.
psych as a science
Features of science
-
The study of cause and effect
-
Falsification
-
Replicability
-
Objectivity
-
Induction
-
Deduction
-
Hypothesis testing
-
Manipulation of variables
-
Control and standardisation
- Quantifiable measurments.
Particularly scientific - biological and cognitive area studies
Less scientific studies: Freud (hanz), Gould,Kohlberg
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Which uni course is most like the economics we learn at A-level? »
- Criminology/sociology book and textbook recommendations »
- Uni of Manchester pharmacy help »
- Physics Optional Module »
- TSR Study Together - STEM vs Humanities - Fourth Session »
- Should I take core maths? »
- Overall tips for my a level choices »
- For those of you who self studied GCSE's by yourself, how? »
- Required practicals chemistry A level »
- GCSE choices »
Comments
No comments have yet been made