CRITICISM
The argument implies you can define anything into existence - which is false.
Definitions only tell us what God would be like IF he existed. They can't establish whether he does actually exist. e.g/ describing a unicorn does not make the unicorn exist.
RESPONSE
Anselm's response was that Islands are contingent and therefore don't have necessary existence as an aspect of their properties. But God does, He is a different order of being and is unique in this aspect.
Existence is not part of the greatness of an island; necessary existence is part of the concept of God.
Explaining concepts can make non-existence apparent. e.g/ round squares can't exist. Therefore concept and actuality are related.
Comments
No comments have yet been made