Criminal Damage Act 1971. Tri-able either way with a max. sentence of 10 years.
AR: Destruction or damage of property belonging to another without lawful excuse
Destroying something is completely ruining it. Damaging something means that it will cost time, money, or effort to restore it to its previous state (Roe v Kingerlee). Even if the damage will be naturally removed, it is still damage (Hardman v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset).
Property must be of a tangible nature, whether real or personal, including money.
It belongs to someone if they have "custody or control of it; or have in it any proprietary right or interest; or have a charge on it" (R v Smith).
There are two instances in S5 where D would have a lawful excuse: belief that the owner consented (R v Denton), or if other property was at risk and in need of immediate protection and what D did was reasonable in the circumstances (R v Kelleher).
MR: Intention or recklessness as to the destruction or damage of property
Intention (R v Mohan / R v Pembliton). Recklessness (R v Cunningham).
Comments
No comments have yet been made