Although Seligman’s account may explain depression to a certain extent, it fails to take into account cognitions (thoughts).
ABRAMSON et al (1978) consequently revised the learned helplessness theory to the HOPELESSNESS THEORY.
Abramson argued that people who attribute (explaining the cause of something) failure to internal, stable, and global causes are more likely to become depressed than those who attribute failure to external, unstable and specific causes. This is because the former attributional style leads people to the conclusion that they are unable to change things for the better.
PEOPLE WITH DEPRESSION: internal: blame self, stable: can’t change, global: apply to life
PEOPLE WITHOUT DEPRESSION: external: outside of control, unstable: won’t stay the same, specific: apply to one scenario.
Comments
No comments have yet been made