Child Language Theorists

?

Nurture: Skinner

Operant conditioning

  • Language learnt through imitation (like all other skills)
  • Reinforcement through rewards from parents (praise/stickers etc) encourages language learning

Strength 

  • imitation has a key role

Weakness

  • language development stages, these are always the same regardless of the language they are learning
  • children seem to have an incredible grasp of grammar
  • an infinite number of sentences, a child cannot have heard every order of all sentences before they have spoken. It's just not physically possible.
1 of 12

Nature: Chomsky

  • children have an innate understanding of grammar
  • Language Acquisition Device (LAD) be able to learn the language as soon as you come into contact with it.

Strengths

  • under/overextension-overextension of the 'ed' past participle eg 'wented' instead of 'went' clearly not imitating a parent
  • Impressive speed of LA 
  • Don't replicate all parents grammatical errors (if we do it is usually due to the dialect)

Weaknesses

  • Interaction does have a key role (Bard and Sachs study, feral children, Viktor and Genie)
2 of 12

Social interaction theory: Bruner

  • Language Acquisition Support System (LASS)
  • External support of MKO (More Knowledgeable Others) through reinforcement and child-directed speech, environment and social routine
  • Conservation and pragmatic skills learnt through interactions with adults
3 of 12

Social interaction theory: Vygotsky

Zone of Proximal Development 

  • Learner can do unaided
  • Learner can do with guidance (Zone of Proximal Development)
  • Learner cannot do 

The MKO can scaffold the child response, for the items in the middle section, providing sentence starters etc.

4 of 12

Social interaction theory

  • The relationship between parental input and language acquisition is to difficult to measure-hard to know what causes changes between stages
  • interaction does play an important part in language acquisition

These build on Chomsky's theory and together make it quite accurate.

5 of 12

Cognitive theory: Piaget

children are active learners they can't be taught anything until they ready, they use environment and social interactions to shape language

Strengths

  • Connections between cognitive development and language acquisition

Weaknesses

  • Some aspects of language acquisition are separate from cognitive developments ie mental disability doesn't hinder from speaking fluently.
6 of 12

Cognitive theory: Piaget

Sensorimotor stage (>2 years)

  • use senses
  • classify objects
  • only use concrete lexis
  • develop object permanence (in peek-a-boo the child will realise you are not leaving when you cover your face)

Pre-operational (2-7)

  • Language is very egocentric
  • Language and motor skills develop 

Concrete Operational (7-11)

  • Logical thinking about concrete events

Formal operational (<11 years)

  • Abstract reasoning
7 of 12

Nelson

Categorisedchildren's first words into four groups

Naming (things or people) - e.g Daddy 

Actions/Events - e.g. cuddle

Describing/Modifying things - e.g. more

Personal/Social - e.g. bye-bye

8 of 12

Child Directed speech: side 1

Phonology

  • Slower, clearer pronunciation
  • More pauses
  • Higher pitch 
  • Exaggerated intonation

Lexis

  • Simplier, restricted vocabulary
  • Concrete lexis referring to objects in immediate surroundings
  • Diminutive forms e.g. 'doggie'

Grammar

  • Simpler construction
  • frequent use of imperatives
  • lots of repetition
  • frequent questions
  • use of personal names instead of pronouns
9 of 12

Child Directed speech: side 2

Types of CDS

Motherese

  • Exaggerated tone
  • Wide range and variability of pitch simplifies the language 
  • expansion and recasting

Teaches the words

Fatherese

  • Not much different from non-CDS

Teaches the grammar

10 of 12

Berko - wugs

  • Provided evidence for the belief that children overgeneralise
  • 'this is a wug. Now there is another one. There are two of them. There are two ____'
  • Children (¾ of 4-5 year olds) formed the regular plural form of 'wugs' they were applying their innate language skills to this noun despite never hearing what a wug is.
11 of 12

Berko and Brown

  • Found that a child who referred to a fish as a 'fis'
  • this child couldn't tell the difference between the adults use of fish and his use of 'fis'
  • however when an adult referred to a fish like 'fis' corrected them 

Child: A fis

Adult: Is this your fis?

Child; No a fis

Adult: Is this your fish?

Child: Yes my fis

12 of 12

Comments

TheCakeWalters

Report

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Similar English Language resources:

See all English Language resources »See all Child language acquisition resources »