Child Language Theorists
- Created by: anaaclarkkkk
- Created on: 12-04-18 09:51
Nurture: Skinner
Operant conditioning
- Language learnt through imitation (like all other skills)
- Reinforcement through rewards from parents (praise/stickers etc) encourages language learning
Strength
- imitation has a key role
Weakness
- language development stages, these are always the same regardless of the language they are learning
- children seem to have an incredible grasp of grammar
- an infinite number of sentences, a child cannot have heard every order of all sentences before they have spoken. It's just not physically possible.
Nature: Chomsky
- children have an innate understanding of grammar
- Language Acquisition Device (LAD) be able to learn the language as soon as you come into contact with it.
Strengths
- under/overextension-overextension of the 'ed' past participle eg 'wented' instead of 'went' clearly not imitating a parent
- Impressive speed of LA
- Don't replicate all parents grammatical errors (if we do it is usually due to the dialect)
Weaknesses
- Interaction does have a key role (Bard and Sachs study, feral children, Viktor and Genie)
Social interaction theory: Bruner
- Language Acquisition Support System (LASS)
- External support of MKO (More Knowledgeable Others) through reinforcement and child-directed speech, environment and social routine
- Conservation and pragmatic skills learnt through interactions with adults
Social interaction theory: Vygotsky
Zone of Proximal Development
- Learner can do unaided
- Learner can do with guidance (Zone of Proximal Development)
- Learner cannot do
The MKO can scaffold the child response, for the items in the middle section, providing sentence starters etc.
Social interaction theory
- The relationship between parental input and language acquisition is to difficult to measure-hard to know what causes changes between stages
- interaction does play an important part in language acquisition
These build on Chomsky's theory and together make it quite accurate.
Cognitive theory: Piaget
children are active learners they can't be taught anything until they ready, they use environment and social interactions to shape language
Strengths
- Connections between cognitive development and language acquisition
Weaknesses
- Some aspects of language acquisition are separate from cognitive developments ie mental disability doesn't hinder from speaking fluently.
Cognitive theory: Piaget
Sensorimotor stage (>2 years)
- use senses
- classify objects
- only use concrete lexis
- develop object permanence (in peek-a-boo the child will realise you are not leaving when you cover your face)
Pre-operational (2-7)
- Language is very egocentric
- Language and motor skills develop
Concrete Operational (7-11)
- Logical thinking about concrete events
Formal operational (<11 years)
- Abstract reasoning
Nelson
Categorisedchildren's first words into four groups
Naming (things or people) - e.g Daddy
Actions/Events - e.g. cuddle
Describing/Modifying things - e.g. more
Personal/Social - e.g. bye-bye
Child Directed speech: side 1
Phonology
- Slower, clearer pronunciation
- More pauses
- Higher pitch
- Exaggerated intonation
Lexis
- Simplier, restricted vocabulary
- Concrete lexis referring to objects in immediate surroundings
- Diminutive forms e.g. 'doggie'
Grammar
- Simpler construction
- frequent use of imperatives
- lots of repetition
- frequent questions
- use of personal names instead of pronouns
Child Directed speech: side 2
Types of CDS
Motherese
- Exaggerated tone
- Wide range and variability of pitch simplifies the language
- expansion and recasting
Teaches the words
Fatherese
- Not much different from non-CDS
Teaches the grammar
Berko - wugs
- Provided evidence for the belief that children overgeneralise
- 'this is a wug. Now there is another one. There are two of them. There are two ____'
- Children (¾ of 4-5 year olds) formed the regular plural form of 'wugs' they were applying their innate language skills to this noun despite never hearing what a wug is.
Berko and Brown
- Found that a child who referred to a fish as a 'fis'
- this child couldn't tell the difference between the adults use of fish and his use of 'fis'
- however when an adult referred to a fish like 'fis' corrected them
Child: A fis
Adult: Is this your fis?
Child; No a fis
Adult: Is this your fish?
Child: Yes my fis
Related discussions on The Student Room
- What is this? »
- AQA A-Level English Language - Child Language Acquisition »
- english language OCR alevel »
- Child Language Acquisition - Stages »
- Help Child Language Acquition English Language A level AQA »
- Religious studies vs English language A level »
- Speech development in children »
- A-Level English »
- AQA English Language A Level CLA »
- should I take english language or sociology a-level? »
Comments
Report