AQA A2 LAW03 - Murder

HideShow resource information


Murder is a common law offence, meaning that it is not set out in an Act of Parliament.

Lord Coke gave the classic definition of murder, which was updated to be: "the unlawful killing of a reasonable creature with malice aforethought."

1 of 4

Actus reus

AR - the unlawful killing of a reasonable creature

The unlawful act can be done through an act or an omission.

A killing will be unlawful when there is no justification - examples of justified killings would be those done in self defence (consider the case of Tony Martin), through police duties, through necessity or through the withdrawal of medical treatment.

A victim is considered to be a reasonable creature if they are independent of their mother (in regards to a foetus), as ruled in the case of AG Ref. No3. In terms of critically ill people, it must be considered whether the brain stem has died - R vs. Malcherek and Steel. 

2 of 4

Mens rea

(Consider the laws on causation for the AR - is there a clear link between the defendant's actions and the consequence (i.e. the death)?)

Express malice aforethought is the intention to kill.

Implied malice aforethought is the intention to cause GBH/serious harm.

R vs. Vickers told us that a defendant doesn't need to intend to kill in order to be guilty of murder - the intention to cause GBH will suffice. R vs. Cunningham approved this decision.

Direct and indirect intention is applied to both levels of the MR. 

Direct intention will consider whether it was the D's aim/purpose (R vs. Mohan) to kill/cause GBH.

Indirect intention will consider whether the killing/GBH was a "virtual certainty" (R vs. Woollin) given the D's actions and whether the D was aware of this.

3 of 4


If a D is found guilty of murder, then the judge must impose a mandatory life sentence.

4 of 4


No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »