Dispute over characteristics of imprinting - original concept, encounter w/ appropriat object -> image of imprint irreversibly stamped on nervous system. Now, seen as more 'plastic + forigiving mechanism'.
Harlow's study, 2 stimulus objects varied in more ways that being cloth-covered or not. 2 heads were diff - acted as confounding variable, therefore conclusions lack internal validity.
Animal studies - can't be fully generalised to human behaviour.
Ethics - monkeys distressed, created lasting emotional harm.
Comments
No comments have yet been made