Alternative Evidence:

HideShow resource information

Terrace (1979)

  • Trained a Chimpanzee called 'Nim Chimsky'
  • Recorded on tape, over 200,000 communications from Nim
  • During a 2 year period
  • Concluded that there was a marked difference between Nim's communcation + child language
  • Concluded = Nim wasn't using the equivalent of human language

CONTRADICTS G+G

  • Nim Chansky's language acquistion appears to be the result of 'parrot fashion' learning RATHER than a meaningful acquistion of language
1 of 2

Loulis:

  • Washoe had an adoptive son, Loulis
  • Researchers only signed 7 words to him
  • Loulis acquired his vocabularly of over 50 signs from other chimpanzees he lived with
  • (Washoe, Moja, Tatu + Dar)
  • mirroring the manner in which human children learn language.

SUPPORTS G+G

This supports G&G, as it shows the chimps must have learnt and understood the signs, to be able to teach Loulis.

Furthermore, it shows how chimps can acquire language, as Loulis evidently learnt 50 signs.

2 of 2

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Core studies resources »