Aggression
Brief Summary of main thories/explanations including evaluation :)
- Created by: Lorna Kingsbury-Smith
- Created on: 07-06-12 12:31
Theories of Aggression
Social Learning Theory - Bandura
emphasis on learning occurring in the social context controlled by the environment
Bandura, we learn by direct and vicarious expereinces:
direct = individual is rewarded for the behaviour, makes it likely to be repeated -> based on Skinner's rules of operant conditioning
vicarious = learn specifics of aggression by seeing people get rewarded/punished, therfore learn where its appropriate
3 Main stages of modelling behaviour:
1) Aqisition -> learn the aggressive behaviour
2) Instigation -> imitate the behaviour in a similar situation
3) Regulation -> positive reinforcement via rewards
Bandura believed behaviour reinforced by family members is the most prominent source of behaviour modelling
Social Learning Theory AO2/3
+ useful applications -> if we know children imitate behaviours we can be more careful and set better examples
+ theory makes sense -> obvious, we see children imitate things
- Reductionist -> ignores biological and envolutionary factors
+ explains inconsistencies -> people can be domineering at home but submissive at work
+ explains cultural differences -> !kung tribe known as the peaceful people, Yananamo tribe is aggressive
+ Bandura's Bobo doll study
- 72 child pp's, half exposed to aggressive model & half non aggressive, half same sex model, half different sex model
- control group of 24 -> no role model
- before expereiment pp's aggressiveness measured
- found children who watched aggressive model acted more aggressively towards the doll
- gender made a significant difference
Theories of Aggression
Deindividuation
Psychological state characterised by lowered self esteem and decreased concern about evaluation by others
leads to increase in behaviours that are usually inhibited by social norms
become deindividuated when in crowds/large groups and in situations where you are anonymous
Gustav le Bon, noticed individuals are capable of extraordinary acts of violence when part of a crowd duing the French revolution, he believed its was the unique properties of crowds causing this behaviour as people are less identifiable so feel less accountable for thier actions.
Festinger, came up with the term deindividuation, people lose themselves and act in ways they wouldn't otherwise do, become less aware and lose personal responsibility
Deindividuation AO2/3
- prosocial behaviour -> deindividuation doesn't always lead to aggression
- gender bias -> aggression as a result of deindividuation is more of a male characteristic -> links to evolutionary approach -> hunt in packs
+ cultural differences -> tribes that significantly alter their appearance via body paint act more aggressively e.g. torturing victims -> become anonymous
+ rehm et al, 2 teams playing handball, one in own clothes other wearing orange bibs, those wearing the bibs played more aggressively
- reductionist -> behavioural approach only -> could be biological, aggression caused by genes
+ real world application -> Mann, used concept of deindividuation to explain baiting crowds associated with suicide jumpers & Mullen, used it to explain behaviour of lynch mobs
Institutional Aggression
Importation Model - Irwin & Cressey
Prisoners bring in their own traits and personal histroy, pre existing personal & psychological factors affect aggression in prison
kane & Janus, alcohol, drugs, low education levels, unemployment and a more serious criminal reocord correlated with a greater likleyhood of aggression
race & age are important in influencing aggression
-> Kane & Janus, US non whites and younger inmates are more likely to act aggressively in prison as they are more likely to become disenfracnchised and separated from societies norms and values. They are more likely to join subcultures where aggression is valued and respected
3 subcultures:
1) Convict -> raised in prison system, seek positions of power/influnece, most likely to be aggressive
2) Criminal/theif -> follow norms and values of career criminal/perfessional thief e.g. don't betray others
3) conventional -> one time offenders, indentify with staff, least likely to be aggressive
Importation model AO2/3
+ detailed explanation -> variety of people and different categories used
- not everyone fits into the categories
- little practical use -> McCorkle, fails to provide suggestions on how to manage aggression
+ gang support -> looked at real life gangs for support on choosing categories
- Delisi, studied 800 inmates and found no evidence that gang members carried violent behaviour into prison
Institutional aggression
Deprivation Model - Sykes
situational model -> factors within institutions cause aggression e.g. overcrowding, noise and lack of meaningful activity
Deprivation of:
1) Liberty -> not trusted to live in free world, morally rejected by society
2) autonomy -> no power and have few choices, often not given explanations
3) good and services -> have no luxuries
4) heterosexual relationships -> important part of self identity, increased chance of homosexual encounters leads to greater anxiety
5) security -> fear for own safety, hightened sense of physical threat
suffering these deprivations cause some inmates to act aggressively to relieve stress and obtain desired resources
Deprivation model AO2/3
+ evidence to support claim that peer violence is used to reduce deprivation
-> McCorckle et al, found that overcrowding, lack of meaningful activity and lack of privacy all singnificantly increase peer violence
+ real world applications -> if we know what causes aggression then we know how to reduce it
-> however Nijaman found that increased personal space didn't decrease levels of violence
- McCorkle, suggests that levels of stress in prisons remains constant whereas out breaks of violence are rare, siggesting violence is due to bad management rather than deprivation
Biological Explanations
Neural mechanisms
seretonin -> low levels associated with aggression
seretonin works by inhbiting emotional stimuli that leads to violence, low levels means increased susceptibilty to impulsive & aggressive behaviour
Evidence -> Mann et al, drugs that deplete seretonin levels found to increase aggression
AO2/3
+ evidence using animals -> Raleigh et al, changed diets of vervet monkey using suplements that either increased or decreased seretonin, decrease led to more aggressive behaviour
-> - ethics of using animals
+ drugs that raise seretonin levels (antidepressants) reduce aggression
Neural mechanisms in aggression
Dopamine -> increased levels associated with aggression
evidence comes from studies using drugs:
Lavine, demonstrated it using amphetamines which caused increased aggressive behaviour
Buitelaar, reduced aggression using antipsychotics in violent delinquents
AO2/3
- causal role of dopamine inconclusive -> consequence rather than cause, dopamine released as a postive reinforcer when acting aggressively
Biological Explanations
Hormonal Mechanisms
testosterone -> high levels associated with aggression
Dabbs, highest levels found in criminals with the most violent criminal record, whereas lowest levels found in criminals with non-violent crimes
Lindman et al, found young males that act aggressively when drunk have higher levels than those who are not
AO2/3
- gender bias -> research mainy on males, testosterone also found in females
-> studies suggest successful women have higher levels as a result of being more assertive (characteristic of aggression)
Hormonal mechanisms in aggression
Cortisol -> low levels associated with aggression
cortisol inhibits testosterone so low levels causes an increase in testosterone resulting in aggresion
Virkkunen, low levels found in violent habitual offenders
Tennes & Kreye, low levels found in violent school children
AO2/3
- cause and effect -> most data corrlational, not all fators are measured
+ real world applications -> know what causes aggression so can prevent it
Biological Explanations
Genetic Factors
twin & adoption studies
twin -> MZ twins share all DNA, DZ only 50%. If MZ twins are alike in terms of aggressive behaviour then it suggests there is a strong genetic influence
McGuffin & Gottesman, found concordance rates of 87% for MZ and 72% for DZ
adoption -> if a possible correlation is found between adopted child and their aggressive behviour and the biological parent then it implies its genetic
if a stronger correlation is found between the adoptee and adoptive parents then its environmental
Mendrick, 14000 adoptees (all boys) with criminal records had a basline of 14%
boys with adoptive parents with criminal records = 15%
boys with biological parents with criminal records = 20%
boys with both having criminal records = 25%
-> genetics shown to be more influnetial
Twin & adoption studies AO2/3
- interpretation of results -> often they are muddled and unclear
- problems with measuring aggression -> what is aggression, how is it defined, use of questionnaires
- imperfect nature of adoption studies -> hard to find large numbers of MZ twins reared apart
+ Nature vs. Nurture -> should be clear which is exerting more influence
Biological Explanations
A gene for aggression
one of the genes responsible for producing MAOA is associated with aggression
MAOA regulates seretonin levels in the brain -> low levels = aggression
Brunner, study of a violent Dutch family, many of the men had abnormally low levels of MAOA and also had the defective gene that produces MAOA
Caspi et al, 2 variants of the gene for MAOA, one associated with high levels of MAOA and one with low levels. Those with low levels more likely to act aggressively but only if maltreated as children.
-> suggesting that the interaction between genes and the environment determines aggression
AO2/3
+ Bock & Goode, lack of gene for MAOA found in mice, caused them to be 2 x as a aggressive
- more than one gene that contributes to behaviour -> multiple genes for aggression??
- social/enivironmental influnences -> children learn through imitation
Evolutionary Explanations
Aggression serves the function to protect pre creation potential & for survival
a major concern for males is to find a mate and pass on genes
cuckoldry & sexual jealousy
men may experience parental uncertainty -> at risk of cuckoldry
sexual jealousy used to deter mate from sexual infidelity, minimising the risk of cuckoldry
Mate retention & violence
Buss, claims males evolved strategies to deter mates from infidelity
direct guarding = protection against attention from other males
threats = deter women from sexual infedlity by threatening to use violence
Evolutionary Explanations AO2/3
- gender bias -> studies shown that women use them retention strategies aswell
+ real world applications -> early signs of mate retention strategies in romantic relationships can alert family and friends of potential violence in that relationship
+ mate retention -> Shackleford, 214 pp's found women reported a higher use of verbal possession signals
+ explains uroroxide (wife killing) -> men gurad against their partners infidelity by giving benefits e.g. money, or by inflicting costs e.g. violence
if men can't offer any benefits then they incurr costs, Daly & Wilson suggest that wife killing maybe a unitended consequence of behaviours designed to control their partner
Explanations of Group Display
Lynch mobs
when groups feel at risk, survival becomes vital so aggression to outsiders is likely
Patterson claims lynch mobs were more active during social transition e.g. after abolotion of slavery because of the fear of negros, 'lynch law' was used as a social control.
power threat hypothesis used to explain this
-> Blalock, as minority group membership grows, majority group members intensify their efforts to remain dominant
groups that pose a threat to the majority are subject to violence -> negors seen as a threat
AO2/3
- Mullen, analysed 60 newspaper articals of lynchings and found an alternative explanation -> deindividuation, large groups leads to breakdown of self regulation and increased aggression
- contradictory evidence -> Clark performed a comparative study of lynchings in Brazil found that the threat of 'dangerous classes' e.g. negros was not a predictory factor in lynchings -> goes against power threat hypothesis
Explanations of Group Display
Religious Rituals
cost signalling theory -> engaging in painful group rituals signals your commitment to the group
adaptive response to act as a deterent to outsiders and allows them to maintain group cooperation
AO2/3
+ Sosis & Bressler, found religious groups impose twice as many costly commitments on members, compared to non-religious groups
-> shows that groups that require the greatest shows of commitment from members, produce the most commitment and last the longest
-> therefore they do serve as an adaptive response
+ real world application -> in times of need, religious group members provide collective social insurance and support the people most in need
Explanations of Group Display
Sport Events
xenophobia = an unreasonable fear or hatred of foreigners or strangers
natural selection favours genes that encourage altruism towards own group members but are intolerant to outsiders
serves as an adaptive response to protect against outsiders and their potentially negative impact
Podaliri & Balestri, analysed behaviour of Italian football crowds, found group display in the forms of chanting and banners which stressed differences between groups
AO2/3
+ real world applications -> xenophobic displays motivated many football clubs to take action against it e.g. celtic and rangers
- deterministic -> aggressive acts determined by being in a group, no account for free will (chose how you want to behave)
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Psychology Aggression 16 marker »
- Ethological explanations aggression »
- Psychology research »
- Should I complain to manager? »
- Psychology AQA 4 Marker- Ethological Explanation of Aggression »
- Marking AQA a-level Psychology Essay: Evaluate and outline the social learning theory »
- Can I get all 10 evaluation marks on a Psych 16 marker without using other studies? »
- poor lecturers / course change »
- Is rough masturbation bad? »
- Paper-3 16 marker essays - AQA A-Level Psychology »
Comments
No comments have yet been made