A2 Sociology Methods
Revision cards with a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of the different methods used in sociology (observation, statistics etc...) For use in the methods in context essay question Hope it's helpful(:
- Created by: Sonia
- Created on: 04-04-12 11:02
Observation
Overt non-participant observation: participants are aware they are being observed and observer isn't involved in participant activities
Advantages: ethical (no deception), easier to record information, less worry due to no pretense, can ask questions
Disadvantages: demand characteristics 'hawthorn effect', bias findings (as it down to the interpretation of the researcher)
Covert participant observation: Observer gets involved with the activities of the participant and they are unaware of being observed
Advantages: More in-depth information (qualitative), higher validity(act more naturally), first-hand experience (give insight), can find reasons and opinions
Disadvantages: unethical (deception), time and money (expensive), training needed, unrepresentative- unreliable, loss of objectivity (too involved= risk of going 'native'), difficult to record data, issues of getting in- staying in-getting out without suspicion/ harm to observer (dangerous in some cases).
Interviews
Structured Interviews: set questions, framework
Advantages: quantitative, reliable data, easily quantified, suitable for hypothesis testing, can see comparisons/trends and patterns, easy, fairly quick, respondents who can't read/write can be included
Disadvantages: not valid, restrict interviewees giving detailed answers (limited and little scope), interviewer bias, costs for training interviwer
Unstructured interviews: no set questions, topic area to base discussion around and questions would flow throughout
Advantages: sensitive issues can be researched, rapport built up (higher validity), no restriction on answers, clarification of meanings, qualitative data (gives insight)
Disadvantages: time consuming (no stopping point), sample size (unrepresentative), lack quantitative data, not reliable, interviewer bias, social desirability, difficult to code-> quantify and see correlations
Official Statistics
Official statistics: secondary data already in existence collected by government in a standardised way. e.g. census
Advantages: free, large quantitative data (representative), allow comparisons between groups, collected at regular intervals= show trends/patterns over time (see effects of legislation/ policy changes), reliable (standardised way= set procedures), easily analysed for relationships, saves time/money/effort
Disadvantages: government collect for own purposes (may not entirely relate to interested topic area), definitions state uses may be different to sociologists= different views on how large a problem is, categories change over time= harder to compare different years, validity issues= hard stats are valid (births/deaths/divorce), soft stats aren't valid (recording all crimes/ racist incidences in society) - could be elements of social construction involved, political bias, not whole picture = unreported crimes, no qualitative data= can't find opinions/ explanations
Questionnaires
Questionnaires: list of questions given out to participants to complete- can be open questions (freedom and space to write own answer) or closed questions (answers are set and respondent chooses one (or more) options)
Advantages: quick, cheap, gather large amounts of data, can be geographically spread out, no recruitment or training needed, data easily quantifiable= processed quickly to reveal relationships, closed questions give reliable data and quantitative data, no researcher present may influence answers, few ethical issues= under no obligations to answer and can be anonymous
Disadvantages: limited and superficial = there's need to be brief for response, cheap however need for incentives e.g. prize draw (costly), have low response rates (not representative), inflexible method= finalized questions offer no scope to explore new areas of interest, respondents may not answer the question (give wrong answer), answers may be illegible or incomprehensible, lack validity due to social desirability
Documents
Documents: Letters, government reports, historical treaties, diaries.
Advantages: high validity= authentic statement of authors views, qualitative data= insight and meaning, can study the past
Disadvantages: unreliable= unstandardised (diary= unique), unrepresentative (only literate groups write diaries), bias (when researcher interprets findings)
Historical documents: assessing them
> authenticity (claims to be? missing pages? who wrote it?)
> credibility (believable? author sincere? accurate? representative? generalise? survival document typical or lost/destroyed ones?)
>meaning (translated? interpret document to find authors meaning?)
Case studies/ Longitudinal studies
Case studies: in-depth research into a particular individual, following them and their experiences
Advantages: detailed insight, qualitative data
Disadvantages: not representative, can't generalise findings
Longitudinal studies: in-depth research into a particular individual/group, following them and their experiences through a long period of time (several years)
Advantages: trace developments over period of time, creates a more detailed picture of events, can compare groups over time
Disadvantages: sample attition (loss of sample)= less representative, large data is difficult to analyse= can't obtain results quickly, costly, hawthorn effect.
Content analysis
Content analysis: method of dealing systematically with the contents of documents. A tally chart is created with categories and certain answers are tallied in the category it falls into
Advantages: cheap, easy to find sources of material, useful source of quantitative objective scientific data
Disadvantages: simply just counting number of time something appears in documents doesn't tell us anything about it's meaning/ give any explanations
Lab experiment
Lab experiment: artificial environment, with controlled variables
Advantages: reliable, can replicated precisely with every detail and similar results can be produced, high control over variables and no involvement of researchers personal feelings/opinions (objectivity), identifies cause and effect relationships in the natural sciences by measuring patterns quantitatively
Disadvantages: impossible to identify and control ALL variables, can't be used to study the past, usually small sample so reduced representativness, ethics: consent/misleading participants, harm etc.., hawthorn effect: artificial environment causes change in behaviour of participants due to awareness, freewill= behaviour can't be explained by cause and effect it is in fact the choices made by people
Field experiment/ Comparative Method
Field experiment: Natural setting, fewer variables controlled
Advantages: less artificial= more valid results as more natural behaviour is shown
Disadvantages: less control so can't be certain the causes identified are the correct one, unethical= no informed consent and deception
Comparative method: (thought experiment) carried out in researches mind to discover cause and effect relationships 1.) 2 similar groups found with one variable difference between them 2.) compare to see if the variable difference has any effect e.g. Durkheim suicide study
Advantages: avoids artificiality, can be used to study past events, no ethical problems
Disadvantages: even less control over variables, researcher bias
Related discussions on The Student Room
- Sociology Help Thread »
- psychology vs sociology a level »
- Sociology as a science »
- Sociology at Durham »
- unsure on uni courses »
- A-level Sociology Study Group 2022-2023 »
- Sociology research methods/methods in context »
- AQA A Level Sociology Paper 1 (7192/1) - 20th May 2024 [Exam Chat] »
- Should I take both sociology and phycology at the same time? »
- psychology OCR research methods A Level »
Comments
Report