Sir Francis Bacon on Henry VII

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: Matt Lowe
  • Created on: 09-04-13 12:56
Preview of Sir Francis Bacon on Henry VII

First 1201 words of the document:

Sir Francis Bacon wrote in his Advancement of Learning of the importance of biography as a branch of historical writing,
pointing out that it is individuals who direct the actions that are recounted in historical chronicles and suggesting that these
events can be best examined in the light of the characters of the men who make them. It is this principle that underlies
Bacon's HISTORY OF THE REIGN OF KING HENRY VII, which is one of the first analytical biographies in the English
language.
Bacon wrote his history of Henry VII in a few months during the year following his impeachment in 1621. He was exiled from
London, and therefore from many of the sources that would have enabled him to produce new information about Henry's
reign. He depended heavily upon the sixteenth century chronicles, especially the history of the early years of the century
written by Polydore Vergil. What is original and noteworthy in Bacon's volume is his study of the personality of his subject
and its effect upon the course of the English nation during his reign. Bacon is original, too, in his strong emphasis upon the
laws of Henry's day as a distinguished lawyer and Lord Chancellor of England at the height of his career, he was thoroughly
familiar with the statute books and the development of the common law, and he felt the significance of innovations in the
reign he chronicled. He praised Henry's laws as "deep, and not vulgar not made upon the spur of a particular occasion for
the present, but out of providence of the future, to make the estate of his people still more and more happy after the manner
of the legislators in ancient and heroical times."
Bacon follows a chronological plan in his history, concentrating upon the years after the Battle of Bosworth Field, where
Henry dethroned Richard III in 1485. His account alternates between narration and set speeches in the manner of the
classical historians the conversations between important personages add considerable interest to the book.
Bacon presents many facets of Henry's personality as he relates his actions on first gaining the throne. There is a masterful
analysis of the king's deliberations about the wisest grounds for claiming royal power, which he held by conquest through
his wife, the eldest surviving child of Edward IV and the heir through the Yorkist line and in his own right, less clear, through
the Lancastrian line. Bacon pictures Henry's reasoning in this manner: "the inconveniences appearing unto him on all parts,
and knowing there could not be any interreign, or suspension of title, and preferring his affection to his own line and blood,
and liking that title best which made him independent and being in his nature and constitution of mind not very apprehensive
or forecasting of future events afar off, but an entertainer of fortune by the day resolved to rest upon the title of Lancaster as
the main, and to use the other two, that of marriage and that of battle, but as supporters, the one to appease secret
discontents, and the other to beat down open murmur and dispute."
Through his account of the major events of the reign--the successive uprisings of discontented commoners and fractious
noblemen invasions by impostorPlantagenets who claimed to be true heirs to the throne lengthy negotiations with Emperor
Maximilian, the ineffectual ruler of the Holy Roman Empire, and with King Charles VII of France, a considerably more
formidable foe and the slow formation of an alliance with the politically sagacious Ferdinand of Spain, whose throne rested
on foundations almost as uncertain as Henry's--emerges a picture of the English king as a man cautious and deliberative,
reluctant to fight, yet skillful in using the threats of war to fill his own coffers, merciful to most of his rebellious subjects, but
ruthless in the extermination of others, notably Edward Plantagenet, one of the few surviving Yorkist claimants to the throne,
when their deaths seemed expedient.
Henry's skill in the game of statecraft is evident in Bacon's discussion of the lengthy and somewhat confusing conflict with
Charles of France over the control of the Duchy of Brittany. The author cites a message from Henry to Charles proclaiming
the English monarch's friendship for both the French king and the Duke of Brittany and offering his services as mediator.
Bacon explains Henry's desire to avoid military conflict whenever possible: "A fame of a war he liked well, but not an
achievement . . . and he was possessed with many secret fears touching his own people, which he was therefore loath to
arm."
The liveliest portions of Bacon's narrative are the accounts of the uprisings on behalf of Lambert Simnell and Perkin
Warbeck, boys brought forth by opponents of the king, the former as Edward Plantagenet, the latter as Richard, Duke of
York, one of the princes murdered in the Tower of London. Both impostors were supported by English noblemen and by
Continental sympathizers with the Yorkist cause, especially Margaret, Duchess of Burgundy, a close relative of Edward IV.
Henry coped skillfully with both plots, punishing their instigators and trying to make examples of the youthful conspirators.
Simnell was made a kitchen boy Perkin, whose campaign came far nearer success and lasted for several years, became a
juggler at court for a time. However, after he had escaped, been arrested again, and been imprisoned in the tower, he
initiated a new and far more threatening conspiracy with the real Edward Plantagenet, Earl of Warwick, who, as the nephew
of Edward IV, had a legitimate claim to the throne. As a result of their plot both Warbeck and the prince were executed.
Henry incurred considerable public displeasure by his severity with them, though he tried to place the blame on his ally,
Ferdinand, who cooperated by saying that he could not allow his daughter, Katherine of Aragon, to wed the Prince of Wales
so long as Warwick lived as a threat to the succession of his future soninlaw.
Bacon does not gloss over the later years of Henry's rule, when his henchmen Empson and Dudley perverted the laws of the
realm to confiscate land and wealth from subjects all over the kingdom. Henry's avarice increased with his age, and he left
enormous wealth at his death, riches soon to be dispersed by his pleasureloving son, Henry VIII.
Bacon concludes his account of Henry's reign with a character sketch of the king. He summarizes the traits of character
that he has shown influencing English policy throughout the reign, portraying Henry as a shrewd ruler, a crafty statesman
who calculated the effects of all his actions and "knew the way to peace was not to seem to be desirous to avoid wars." He

Other pages in this set

Page 2

Preview of page 2

Here's a taster:

Empson, Dudley, and others who performed
his less attractive tasks served him only as the "instrument" does the "workman." Henry's independence is clear in this
comment: "To his confederates abroad he was constant and just, but not open. But rather such was his inquiry, and such
his closeness, as they stood in the light towards him, and he stood in the dark to them yet without strangeness, but with a
semblance of mutual communication of affairs.…read more

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar History resources:

See all History resources »See all resources »