Occupiers Liability Act 1957 - AQA A Level Law
- Created by: eleanorhall18
- Created on: 24-06-19 10:53
who is the occupiers liability act 1957 for? |
||
how many types of lawful visitors are there? |
||
what are they? |
||
what is the duty of care owed to invitees? |
||
what case shows that the occupier had taken 'reasonable care' for the invitee(s)? |
||
what case shows that there was no d.o.c. owed as incident was an accident? |
||
what is the d.o.c. owed to licensees |
||
what is the d.o.c. owed to contractual people? |
||
which lawful visitor type is owed the highest duty of care? |
||
which lawful visitor type is owed the lowest duty of care? |
||
in what instances may the standard of care owed change? |
||
why would the standard of care owed change for children? is it a higher or lower standard of care that is now owed? |
||
what cases back this up? |
||
why would the standard of care owed change for trades people? is it a higher or lower standard of care that is now owed? |
||
what happens if a visitor is injured by the danger created (negligence of) the contractor? |
||
how many requirements need to be satisfied in order so that the occupier can pass the claim to the trades person/workman? |
||
what are they? |
||
what case backs up 'it must be reasonable for the occupier to give work to the contractor'? |
||
what case backs up 'contractor must be competent to carry out the task'? |
||
what case backs up 'occupier must check the work has been done properly'? |
||
how many types of defences are available to the occupier? |
||
what are they? |
||
in what forms can warning notices be in? |
||
what case shows that warning notices weren't enough here? |
Comments
No comments have yet been made