Duty of care
- Created by: bethanymcmenamin
- Created on: 28-03-18 09:46
Date/period |
Event(s) |
|
Donoghue v stevenson |
Getting Started |
|
Anns V Merton |
||
Murphy V Brentwood |
||
Caparo V Dickman |
||
Foreseeability |
||
Kent v Griffiths |
||
proximity |
||
Mcloughlin V O'Brian |
||
Fair, just and reasonable |
||
EPHRAIM v NEWHAM LBC |
||
practical issues - Harris v Perry |
||
Protection of professionals Hall v SimmonsSirrors v Moore |
||
Liability of the police HILL v CC WEST YORKSHIRE |
||
Reeves and Orange |
||
Liability of public bodies -Z V UK |
||
Moral principle Mckay v essex |
||
Omissions |
||
Contractual duty |
||
Barrnet v Chelsea |
||
A defendant may owe a duty because of a special relationship with the claimant |
||
Barrett v Mod |
||
A defendant may owe a duty because of damage caused by a third party who is within his/her control |
||
Haynes v Harwood |
||
The defendant owes a duty because of control over land or some other dangerous thing |
Comments
No comments have yet been made