Skip to content
Showing 1 to 15 of 15
I see no reason for cameras not to be allowed into court..
They once arrested a lil old man for recording (on a voice recorder) a court session.
He'd been doing it all his life.
It was his hobby.
Poor thing. He did nothing wrong.
Yes- to see the stupid murderers make a tantrum on "not killing" the victim.
^ explain what you mean by that.
You know, suspects get angry and demand a shorter sentence and eventually get into a fight. Bit hard to explain my thoughts...I'm probably the only one who can understand my thoughts.
haha :P same.
i kind of understand what you mean, although i dont think that happens openly in court.
i think thats more of a matter between criminal and laywer
we should be able to see our criminals be sentenced
i dont think we should be able to see in courts for malicious reasons, but for educational reasons.
i didnt realise we wernt meant to tbh.
i dont understand why we shouldnt be!
I thought they were allowed.... when celebrities are trialled ((or cases like the one going on now about the man who shot around 70 people at a youth camp)) they're boradcasted on TV.
Excuse this Gabby; but when MJ's doctor was trialled, the whole world was able to watch. Even the the case about the blood diamonds and Naiomi Cambell's involvement was boradcasted on live TV....
So doesn't that mean that camera's can be brought into court??
they are not allowed in COURTS
They are if you've been given permission.