Zimbardo 'Stanford Prison Study'

?
View mindmap
  • Zimbardo 'Stanford Prison Study'
    • Procedure
      • Mock prison set up in basement of psychology department at Stanford Uni, California
      • Ppts = 24 male, normal, healthy, predominately white with middle class college students
        • Psychological-ly + physically screened before
      • Advertised, 75 people responded
      • Prisoners
        • unexpectedly arrested at home
        • put through delousing procedure - given uniform + ID number
          • Uniform - loose fitting smocks, no underwear, lock + chain on ankle, stocking caps to cover hair
        • allowed certain rights - 3 meals + 3 supervised toilety trips a day, 2 visits a week
        • Humiliated
          • Searched, stripped, deloused (remove germs)
      • Guards
        • given uniforms, clubs, whistles, relfective sunglasses (prevent eye contact)
      • expected to last for 2 weeks
      • Debriefings
        • Met with psychologists
      • Ppts would get £15 per day
      • Funded by US Navy
        • Biased?
        • investigating causes of conflict between guards and prisoners in naval prisons
    • Findings
      • Prisoners
        • 5 had to released early due to extreme reactions - emotional breakdowns, crying, rage, etc
        • Didn't take gaurds seriously at the start
        • Began to rebel - this led to further punishment
        • Suffered from 'Psychological power syndrome' - loss of personal identity, dependancy, control by guards
        • Loss of control + identity
      • Guards
        • First they became abusive towards prisoners
          • Woke prisoners in the night + forced them to clean toilets with bare hands - degrading activities
        • Became sadistic
          • showed power through physical punishment
        • Manipulated prison to appear more reasonable to visitors - clean, food, music
      • Ended after 6 days
        • Graduate told Zimabrdo how unfair it was
      • No long term nergative impacts
    • Evaluation
      • Unethical
        • Didn't explain what the prisoners would face
        • Physical + mental harm
        • Lied/decieved parents
        • Made it difficult for ppts to leave
        • BUT Zimbardo argues it is ethical because
          • Only deceptin was the arrests
          • Signed consetnt
          • group + indivudal deberiefings
          • Listen to advice from other psychologists
          • Info gained was worth it
          • stopped the study early
          • Created ethical guidelines
      • Invalid
        • Lacks ecologically validity
          • Results cannot be generlaised as ppts were acting + behavuour may not be influenced by dame factors which affect bahvour in real life
        • Artificial
        • Experiment in uni
        • Prisoners hadn't commited crimes
        • Guards had no traing
        • Dressed in outifts
        • BUT
          • He put real people in a 'prison' + locked them up
      • Unrealiable
        • Volunteered sampling
        • Self selected
    • Conclusion
      • Rejects hypothesis of  'inherent personality traits are primarily responsible for abusive behavior that takes place prison environments'
      • Behaviour of 'normal' students was influenced by their role
      • The prison environment created the guards brutal behaviour
        • Guards weren't sadistic before
      • People conform to the social roles that they're expected to play (especially stereotypes)
      • The roles shape their attitudes + behaviour
      • The 'Pathology of power'
      • The prison environment made the ppts bad
        • Disregards 'Bad people do bad things' which suggests prisons aren't bad due to their environment but due to individuals
    • If 'ordinary' people were placed in a simulated prison environment and some of them were designed guards and some prisoners, how would the behave to their new social roles?
    • Zimbardo, Haney, Banks, Prescott
  • Became enthusiastic
    • Some offered more hours for no pay
    • Guards
      • First they became abusive towards prisoners
        • Woke prisoners in the night + forced them to clean toilets with bare hands - degrading activities
      • Became sadistic
        • showed power through physical punishment
      • Manipulated prison to appear more reasonable to visitors - clean, food, music
    • Behaved sadistically off camera too
  • Ppts often forgot it was a psychological study + they were just acting
    • Still conformed to roles when not being watched
    • Findings
      • Prisoners
        • 5 had to released early due to extreme reactions - emotional breakdowns, crying, rage, etc
        • Didn't take gaurds seriously at the start
        • Began to rebel - this led to further punishment
        • Suffered from 'Psychological power syndrome' - loss of personal identity, dependancy, control by guards
        • Loss of control + identity
      • Ended after 6 days
        • Graduate told Zimabrdo how unfair it was
      • No long term nergative impacts

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Conformity resources »