Partnership

HideShow resource information
View mindmap
  • In different areas, the priorities differed.  For e.g in Liverpool was environmental improvement
    • In Hulme, Manchester, housing improvement was the main focus.
      • in Wolverhampton a science park was required
        • In different areas, the priorities differed.  For e.g in Liverpool was environmental improvement
          • In Hulme, Manchester, housing improvement was the main focus.
            • in Wolverhampton a science park was required
            • All city challenge schemes had things in common:
              • Healthcare problems
              • poor educational levels
              • Single parent families and high dependence on social security
              • Derelict land
              • Low skills,
              • City challenge partnership scheme (UK)
                • Cities competed for this funding which improved and regenerated deprived areas by improving their physical environment, economy and quality of life
                • 92-98 31  city challenge partnerships schism ran in deprived urban areas
                • Government provided £1.4 bn of funding for these schemes and they attracted a total of £7.58bn
      • All city challenge schemes had things in common:
        • Healthcare problems
        • poor educational levels
        • Single parent families and high dependence on social security
        • Derelict land
        • Low skills,
        • City challenge partnership scheme (UK)
          • Cities competed for this funding which improved and regenerated deprived areas by improving their physical environment, economy and quality of life
          • 92-98 31  city challenge partnerships schism ran in deprived urban areas
          • Government provided £1.4 bn of funding for these schemes and they attracted a total of £7.58bn

    Comments

    No comments have yet been made

    Similar Geography resources:

    See all Geography resources »See all Rural and urban challenges and regeneration resources »