Thigpen and Cleckley (1954) Evaluation
- Created by: Melissawalkerrr
- Created on: 01-03-15 15:25
View mindmap
- Thigpen and cleckley (1954) Evalucation
- Ethics
- Psychological harm, stress and depression
- Stop calling out the personalities so frequently
- Invasion of privacy
- Consent from each personality
- Psychological harm, stress and depression
- Sample and Sampling method
- Not generalisable
- Only one sample - hard to compare
- volunteer/ self selected
- Research Method
- Working closely with participant may compromise objectives
- relied on testimony of past events which may be false
- Ask family to correlate events
- Validity and reliability
- No scientific way to confirm presence of other personalities
- Therapist may have provoked another personality to appear
- Some psychiatrists may be more likely to diagnose MPD than others
- Have more than one doctor see the patient
- Quantitative and Qualitative data collected
- more qualitative than quantitative
- Include more quantitative data
- Data is hard to compare and analyse
- more qualitative than quantitative
- Practical application
- Product of questionable therapeutic interventions performed on vulnerable suggestible participants
- Ethics
Comments
No comments have yet been made