The Psychodynamic explanation of offending behaviour.

?
View mindmap
  • The psycho-dynamic explanation of offending behaviour.
    • The Superego.
      • Is the morality principle. A healthy supergo will feel guilt for behaving badly.
        • Blackburn: argued that if an individual's superego is inadequate then their conscience has not developed properly therefore they are more likely to commit crime.
      • The Weak Superego: If same-sex parent is absent during the phallic stage, the child cannot internalise a fully formed superego as there is no opportunity for identification. They are dominated by the ID.
      • The Deviant Superego: is the child internalises has immoral or deviant values would lead to offending behaviour.
    • Defence Mechanisms.
      • Sublimation: displacing emotions onto/into a constructive activity not destructive.
      • Displacement: taking out anger on substitute object.
    • Bowlby's Maternal Deprivation Theory
      • In relation to crime= Bowlby suggested failing to establish a maternal bond could lead to a number of damaging & irreversible consequences in later life. Affectionless Psychopathy.
      • Evaluation
        • Strengths: useful applications, as the theory highlights the importance of children forming emotional attachment in early life in order to avoid potential  offending.
        • Challenging Research: Lewis analysed data drawn from interviews with 500 young people and found maternal deprivation was a poor predictor of future.
        • Issues with Causation: even if there is a link between prolonged separation and committing a crime later in life, doesn't mean link between maternal deprivation and offending. Maternal deprivation could be just one factors, other factors e.g. genetics may play a part.
    • Evaluation.
      • Challenging evidence: Very little evidence that children raised without same-sex parent are less law-abiding. If children with deviant parents could be deviant due to genetics etc. Also criminals try to avoid getting caught.
      • Lack of empirical support: there is a lack of evidence to support the idea which limits the explanation. Also the concept cannot be tested empirically. and lacks falsifiability.
      • Gender Bias: Freud said women develop a weaker superego than men, which implies women should be more prone to offending. This is not supported by any evidence. Has alpha bias.
  • Evaluation.
    • Challenging evidence: Very little evidence that children raised without same-sex parent are less law-abiding. If children with deviant parents could be deviant due to genetics etc. Also criminals try to avoid getting caught.
    • Lack of empirical support: there is a lack of evidence to support the idea which limits the explanation. Also the concept cannot be tested empirically. and lacks falsifiability.
    • Gender Bias: Freud said women develop a weaker superego than men, which implies women should be more prone to offending. This is not supported by any evidence. Has alpha bias.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Criminological and Forensic Psychology resources »