RELATIONSHIPS - The Social Exchange Theory (SET)

View mindmap
  • The Social Exchange Theory
    • General
      • economic approach -> max profit min cost
      • introduced by Thiabault and Kelley (1959)
      • perception of just ONE PERSON in rel (not about what partners thinks)
    • Evaluation (A03)
      • doesn't consider emotions / feelings of people
      • selfish approach to maintenance / breakdown of rel -> selfish
      • perception is NOT a criticism of theory - that's how it actually is in rels. Someone's behav is based on their perception
      • ARGYLE - claimed methodology was artificial, with little relevance to real life
      • research concentrated on short-term rels, not on the consequences of long-terms rels, where maintenance = more important
      • theory applies to people who 'keep score' - people who are more suspicious and insecure. Suggetss theory only relates to people lacking confidence and mutuak trust
    • Rewards & costs
      • perception of what you are getting out of rel (may not be what you are actually getting)
        • deception -> may not see what is going on
      • rewards: examples
        • emotional / financial support
        • sex
        • companionship
        • eye candy / status / power over someone
        • praise
    • Comparison Level (CL)
      • compares idea rel to current rel
        • from media - films, Disney, celeb couples
        • from parents , siblings etc
        • previous rel
      • if DOES NOT match ideal, rel may breakdown and vie versa
    • Comparison Level for Alternatives (CLA)
      • being single, being with some one else
      • if i was with them, would there be more profit with them?
      • may be more rewarding to be single than with someone (more freedom)
    • 4 stage model
      • 1. Sampling -> rewards + costs assessed in a number of rels
      • 2. Bargaining -> rel is 'costed out' and sources of profit and loss are identified
      • 3. Commitment -> rel is established and maintained by a predictable exchange of rewards
      • 4. Institutionalisation -> interactions are established and couple 'settle down'
    • Research
      • HATFIELD - people in under-benefited rels = angry & deprived, over-ben rels = guilty & uncomfortable
      • RUSBULT - costs and rewards of rel were compared against those of alternative rels in order to decided if rel should be maintained (CLA)
      • RUSBULT - women who'd been assaulted by partners were likely to return to them as they had no better alternatives due to lower education, no job prospects and little money access

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Relationships resources »