The Problem of Evil Full Notes
- Created by: AndrewValentine
- Created on: 25-10-18 11:21
View mindmap
- The Problem of Evil
- The Epicurean Paradox
- Epicurus
- Greek Philosopher
- 341-290 BCE
- is God willing but not able?
- Then he is not omnipotent
- is God able, but not willing?
- Then he is malevolent
- is he both able and willing?
- Then whence cometh evil?
- is he neither able nor willing?
- Then why call him God?
- Earliest statement of the problem
- Epicurus
- Against the existence of God
- existence of pain, death and distress are incompatible with an all loving, powerful God
- The Logical Problem
- P1. Evil & Suffering exists
- P2. God is all loving & all powerful
- P3. An all loving & powerful God would remove evil & suffering
- C. God does not exist
- Why wont God prevent evil & suffering?
- Maybe there's a good reason, a plan
- Theodicies
- Maybe it's impossible
- Theodicies
- Maybe there's a good reason, a plan
- Is he all loving / powerful?
- Not all loving
- Deism: God is impersonal
- Not all powerful
- Zoroastrians believe this
- Not all loving
- P3. An all loving & powerful God would remove evil & suffering
- Does evil actually exist?
- Evil is...
- absence of good
- human illusion
- brought on by greed
- views in Hinduism
- brought on by greed
- unhelpful human conduct
- Nietzsche
- Evil is...
- P2. God is all loving & all powerful
- Deductive Argument
- true premises = true conclusion
- false premise = failed
- P1. Evil & Suffering exists
- Theodicies
- Free Will
- Augustinian and Irenaean
- Include the roll of Free Will
- Free Will Defence
- Overtly Christian
- Include the roll of Free Will
- Humans must be genuinely free to choose how they want to respond to God and therefore humans must have genuine free will
- the consequence of this is a world with good and evil
- In order for free will to be genuine, God cannot place limits or intervene
- "The less (God) allows men to bring about large scale horrors, the less the freedom & responsibility he gives them"
- Free Will is a good explanation for moral evil but the free will defense also claims to explain natural evil
- "The less (God) allows men to bring about large scale horrors, the less the freedom & responsibility he gives them"
- a world with death is better than a world without it
- It limits the suffering one person can take
- A limited life focuses attention
- Without death, a person cannot make the ultimate sacrifice
- It stops the old dominating the young
- "a situation of temptation with infinite chances is no situation of temptation at all. If there is always another chance there is no risk"
- But how could God allow so much suffering?
- "Our understanding of suffering is only relative to our own experience"
- John Hick
- if we ask for less suffering we are...
- "asking that God should make a toy world, a world where things matter, but not very much; he would be like an over-protective parent who will not let his child out of sight for a moment"
- Swinburne
- "asking that God should make a toy world, a world where things matter, but not very much; he would be like an over-protective parent who will not let his child out of sight for a moment"
- If some evils are too much, where do we draw the line?
- "Our understanding of suffering is only relative to our own experience"
- What's wrong with the Free Will Defense?
- it claims that God has two options
- Maximum Pleasure. Minimum Pain. But No Free Will
- Pain and Suffering. A price worth paying for Free Will.
- An Omnipotent God could have the best of both
- Supporters of the FWD say that what Mackie says is logically impossible
- J.L. Mackie
- "God is not faced with a choice between making things who, in acting freely, would sometimes go wrong; there was an option for him, the obviously better possibility of making beings who act freely but always right. Clearly his failure to avail himself of this possibility is inconsistent with his being good & omnipotent."
- it claims that God has two options
- Augustinian and Irenaean
- Types of Evil
- Yujin Nagasawa
- A Japanese philosopher believes that the problem of evil causes more of an issue to the atheist than the theist.
- This is because through theodicies, a theist can at least provide some sort of explanation for the existence of evil and through metaphysical / eschatological phenomena can suggest that the universe contains more good than evil.
- A Japanese philosopher believes that the problem of evil causes more of an issue to the atheist than the theist.
- Systemic Evil
- "It is represented as natural selection, an atheist cannot hold an optimistic view about the nature of the universe"
- Charles Darwin
- "It is represented as natural selection, an atheist cannot hold an optimistic view about the nature of the universe"
- Natural Evil
- "This refers to events that have a bad/evil consequence when experienced by human beings. Most philosopher's would agree that natural evils are caused by the way the natural world works."
- Richard Dawkins
- "This refers to events that have a bad/evil consequence when experienced by human beings. Most philosopher's would agree that natural evils are caused by the way the natural world works."
- Yujin Nagasawa
- Challenges
- Gods' Traits
- Descartes
- the Omni-words are incomprehensible to finite human minds
- "You cannot wrap your arms around a mountain"
- the Omni-words are incomprehensible to finite human minds
- Zoroastrianism
- God is not omnipotent
- God suffers and grows with his creation
- God is not omnipotent
- Descartes
- Suffering
- Old Testament
- Suffering is used as a 'correctional device'
- Jesus
- Suffered to emancipate mankind from original sin
- Old Testament
- Reality of Evil
- Dostoevsky
- Can free will be worth the price of innocent people suffering?
- Richard Dawkins
- Even without human beings, the amount of suffering in the animal kingdom is immense.
- Camus
- The evil that is in the world always comes of ignorance, and good intentions may do as much harm as malevolence, if they lack understanding
- Dostoevsky
- Gods' Traits
- The Epicurean Paradox
- God gave humans free will but they choose to disobey
- They create an 'absence of good' within themselves
- Evil is not a thing in itself, but the absence of God
- "Privation of Good"
- Privatio Boni
- Absence of Good
- "Privation of Good"
- Real Compassion
- Real Pain
- Real Generosity
- Real Poverty
- Real Selflessness
- Real Corruption
- Courage
- Cowardly
- Fairness
- Unfair
- Mercy
- Cruel
Similar Philosophy resources:
Teacher recommended
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made