Social Psychology: Obedience Case Studies
- Created by: viincey
- Created on: 23-04-19 15:44
View mindmap
- Social Psychology: Case Studies- Obedience
- Milgram (Variations)
- EXPT 10: Rundown Office Block
- AIM: if institution impacts results
- PROC. CHANGE: study moved to office block in bridgeport, not Yale
- RESULTS: ppts more doubtful- one made notes about legitimacy of expt
- CONC: inconclusive as results didnt differ as much.
- EXPT 7: telephonic instructions
- AIM: if distance to experimenter impacts results
- PROC CHANGE: experimenter out of site giving telephone instructions
- RESULTS: only 9 obey instead of 26
- CONC: easier to disobey when not face to face
- EXPT 13: ordinary man gives orders
- AIM: to see if legitimate authority has an impact
- PROC CHANGE: "ordinary accomplice" gives instructions when exptr leaves room
- RESULTS: 16/20 disobeyed
- CONC: people dont follow regular persons orders as readily
- EXPT 10: Rundown Office Block
- AFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES/GENDER
- INDIVIDUAL DIFF.
- suggest harsh style of parenting may lead to some having an authoritarian personality
- Blass- those watching with authot. less likely to blame teacher for responsibility
- BLASS- linked locus of control and obedience
- GENDER/CULTURE
- Kilham & Mann (1974)- 40% males obeyed, 16% females- so theyre less obedient
- BLASS did a meta analysis and found only this and Gupta's 1983 variations shoewed differences
- K&M (1974)- 0% obedience in cntrl group with australian psych students- during time of anti war demonstrations and campus unrest.
- BLASS: 61% obeyed in US, 66% other countries- no significance
- Kilham & Mann (1974)- 40% males obeyed, 16% females- so theyre less obedient
- INDIVIDUAL DIFF.
- Untitled
- Milgram (Variations)
Comments
No comments have yet been made