Evidence-Based - Seminar 2 (cCBT 3)
- Created by: Former Member
- Created on: 19-04-16 23:40
View mindmap
- Seminar 2 - cCBT
- What is cCBT?
- Emerged as an alternative method of delivering CBT
- Given over the computer via an "interactive interface"
- NICE provided support:
- "Considered as a safe treatment"
- "Recommended on the grounds of clinical and cost effectiveness"
- However NICE note is would not be best for all patients and "would not be appropriate for the management of severe depression"
- Inlucded in IAPT services for mild-mod patients
- Emerged as an alternative method of delivering CBT
- Why cCBT?
- Provides access to services for people who would not otherwise have entered
- Aids those heavily affected by negative stigma surrounding mental health
- Evidence for cCBT
- Proudfoot et al (2004) concludes cCBT is "a widely applicable treatment for anxiety and/or depression"
- Kaltenthaler et al (2008) "evidence to support the effectiveness of cCBT"
- e.g. programmes for depression: MoodCalmer, MoodLifter, NoDep
- Beating the Blues = 8 x 1 hour sessions. Homework + weekly reports to GP
- Evaluation of cCBT
- Good:
- Accessibility - available via internet or phone
- Variety - several programmes available. Some target specific groups
- Improvement - as effective as face to face CBT
- Flexibility - choose session time. Fit into schedule. Shorter treatment period
- Bad:
- Analysis - need initial analysis to determine appropriateness for CBT
- Severity - not suitable for all
- Good:
- Solutions
- Schools to increase exposure / openness to mental health. Improve PC access
- What is cCBT?
Comments
No comments have yet been made