Selection policies

?
  • Created by: ssaidi23
  • Created on: 14-04-22 17:21
View mindmap
  • SELECTION POLICIES
    • Tripartite system (1944)
      • The 1944 Education Act brought in the tripartite system
      • Children were to be allocated to 1 of 3 different types of secondary schools
      • GRAMMAR SCHOOLS were for people who passed the 11+ exam
        • Pupils were mainly middle-class
        • offered an academic curriculum and access to non-manual jobs and higher education
      • SECONDARY MODERN SCHOOLS
        • For pupils who failed the 11+
        • Pupils were mainly working class
        • Offered a non-academic, 'practical' curriculum and access to manual work
      • TECHNICAL SCHOOLS (only existed in few areas)
      • Rather than promoting meritocracy
        • The tripartite system and 11+ promoted inequality
          • This was done by channelling the two social classes into two different types of schools that offered unequal opportunities
      • The tripartite system also justified inequality through the ideology that ability is inborn
        • In reality, children's environment greatly affects their chances of success
          • Middle class parents may be more able to pay for private tuition for their child to succeed
          • Working class may not be able to focus in their household or suffer with material deprivation
        • It was argued that ability could be measured early on in life through 11+
    • Compre-  hensive school system (1965)
      • Aimed to overcome class divide
        • to make education more meritocratic
      • It was left to the local education authority to decide whether to go compre- hensive and not all did.
        • Meaning the grammar secondary divide still exists in many areas
      • FUNCTIONAL- ISTS VIEW
        • See it as fulfilling the essential functions
          • Meritocracy
          • Social integration
      • MARXISTS VIEW
        • Reproduces class  inequality
          • Through continuation of the practice of streaming and labelling
        • Myth of meritocracy
        • Serving the interests of capitalism
        • Streaming
          • Julienne Ford found little social mixing between working class and middle class due to streaming

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Sociology resources:

See all Sociology resources »See all Education resources »