S and DV
- Created by: jadetaylorv
- Created on: 05-12-19 18:57
View mindmap
- Leaving Jurisdiction
- Poel v Poel
- Payne v Payne 2001
- Re AR (A Child) Relocation 2010 - judges uncomfortable with how Payne was applied - welfare principle seemed to have been demoted
- Re D 2010 - too much emphasis on wishes and feelings of parent wanting to relocate - not sufficient consideration of the impact on the child not being able to maintain contact with second parent
-
The Washington Declaration on International Relocation
- reaffirmed that welfare principle has to be overriding determining factor - impact of refusing permission to relocate on primary caregiver is just one of many factors - will not be given elevated status
-
K v K (Relocation; Shared Care Arrangement) 2011 - created a set of principles
- Re F (Relocation) 2012 - emphasised principles - article 8 rights should also be considered - article 8 is right to family life
Comments
No comments have yet been made