Robbery
- Created by: lar.hos
- Created on: 06-06-18 22:25
View mindmap
- ROBBERY
- INTRO: S8 Theft Act 1968, 'Beyond all reasonable doubt' (Woolmington)
- ACTUS REUS
- Unlawful Act
- Act (Hill v Baxter) or Omission (Pittwood)
- Identify Positive Act (Corcoran v Anderton)
- Theft with FORCE APPLIED (R v Dawson & James)
- Identify Positive Act (Corcoran v Anderton)
- Act (Hill v Baxter) or Omission (Pittwood)
- Unlawful Act
- MENS REA
- Guilty Mind
- Intention (Woolin) or Recklessness (Cunningham)
- Recklessness easier for CPS to prove
- Intention to permanently deprive (Ghosh)
- Dishonesty/ Reasonable man
- Intention to permanently deprive (Ghosh)
- Recklessness easier for CPS to prove
- Intention (Woolin) or Recklessness (Cunningham)
- Guilty Mind
- CONC: Sentence by Crown Court, Maximum sentence of LIFE imprisonment
- R v Ghosh
- Surgeon claiming money fro surgeries he didn't do
- 1. D's behaviour must be regarded as dishonest by reasonable and honest people.
- 2. D must appreciate that there behaviour would be regarded as dishonest by reasonable and honest people.
- Surgeon claiming money fro surgeries he didn't do
- Corcoran v Anderton
- DD hit v across back/pulled handbag, V screamed/ dropped bag, DD ran off without the bag
- Guilty= Appropriation occurred, Assumed rights so theft was complete
- DD hit v across back/pulled handbag, V screamed/ dropped bag, DD ran off without the bag
- R v Dawson & James
- DD nudged V in back so lost balance, took wallet.
- Guilty of robbery
- DD nudged V in back so lost balance, took wallet.
Comments
No comments have yet been made