Relationships 1
- Created by: Mubanga Kauseni
- Created on: 10-06-19 12:46
View mindmap
- Relationships
- Partner preferances
- Evolutionary theory suggests that all our behaviours are driven by unconscious psychological mechanisms
- Some features are more desirable for survival purposes than others. Having these features increases the chance of reproduction
- This increases the chances of these desirable characteristics to be passed down to their offspring.
- Eventually, these characteristics become exaggerated over time.
- Sperm is unlimited, men remain fertile for life and are not sure of the paternity so engage is short term multiple dating with promiscuous behaviour
- To increase the chances of their genes being passed on. They engage in Intrasexual selection where males compete for a fertile woman
- This leads to male-female dimorphism in which there are obvious differences between males and women. (Muscular, petite, small)
- Men prefer young, attractive, fertile women
- To increase the chances of their genes being passed on. They engage in Intrasexual selection where males compete for a fertile woman
- Females have limited eggs and are not fertile forever therefore they are choosy with who they date. They engage in long term relationships
- They prefer strong, resourceful dominant men to ensure the survival of them and their child.
- They engage in intersexual selection where they are choosy with who they date and pick men who are genetically fit.
- Factors effecting attraction
- Self disclosure
- The idea that revealing and sharing ones personal information increases attractiveness and intimacy between two people
- Social penetration theory suggests that the gradual process of self disclosing displays trust and intimacy but it must be reciprocated
- The onion theory
- Appropriate timing of disclosure, gender and content of it can affect how well self disclosure works
- Physical attractivness
- Physical attractiveness stems from the evolutionary theory.
- Women with Neotenous features or baby face are deemed more attractive because their baby like face triggers a protective instinct in males
- Physically attractive people are perceived to have good traits about them e.g kind, caring, hard working. This makes them more attractive to us (the halo effect)
- Matching hypothesis is the idea that people won't go for those more attractive than them. They will often go for someone of similar attractiveness
- Filter theory
- How we select partners from a large pool of candidates. The first filter is social demography. (religion, ethnicity, education, geographical location)
- Second is similarity in attitudes. Similar cultural and social attitudes. most common in early relationships. This promotes self disclosure
- Third is complimentary, does your partner compliment your personality and characteristics. What you lack, your partner must have and what you have your partner must lack.
- Self disclosure
- Maintaining relationships
- Social exchange teheory
- The theory suggests that we are likely to maintain a relationship if our rewards and profits outweigh the costs. costs could be time, money, effort and rewards could be fun, attention, esteem.
- Satisfaction is gained if our profit outweighs the costs. We are essentially selfish and want to minimise costs and maximise rewards. If we are dissatisfied we break down the relationship.
- There are two ways we compare our relationship. Comparison level in which we compare our rewards to our last relationship
- Self esteem affects how much profit we expect too get. If we have high esteem we expect more profit, if we have low we are content with a small profit
- Comparison levels of alternatives, we compare the rewards in our current relationship with the rewards we could potentially get in a new relationship
- Equity theory
- The equity theory is based on fairness, SET acts on equality. A relationship will be maintained if there is equity
- Each person should feel like they are getting out the same as they have put in. If there is inequity then there is dissatisfaction
- The person who receives more rewards will feel guilty and the person who doesn't will feel dissatisfied.
- Unlike the SET which argues that if there is dissatisfaction, the relationship is broken down immediately but ET argues that couples will try and regain balance.
- Negotiations are common to achieve fairness. E.g husband cooks, wife cleans instead. The greater the degree of unfairness, the greater the degree of dissatisfaction
- If restoring equity is not possible, the relationship will break down but if it restored it will be maintained
- Rusbults investment theory
- A relationship will be maintained if there are high levels of commitment and commitment is dependent on the investment side, satisfaction and alternatives
- Satisfaction is reached if an individual has their emotional and sexual needs met
- Alternatives refers to if the individual can get greater satisfaction in another relationship. If not, commitment is increased
- Investment size. Things you have put into the relationship, ending it would be costlier to lose what you have invested.
- It could be a direct investment (time, money, effort) or indirect (house, shared friends, children) the greater the investment size, the costlier it is to end it
- Social exchange teheory
- Partner preferances
Comments
No comments have yet been made