PROCEDURES AND METHODOLOGY
- Created by: hellishseren
- Created on: 15-05-22 13:12
View mindmap
- methodology and procedures
- biological
- the Independent variable was the NGRI the Dependent variable was the brain
- 39 men and two women
- control group was people who dont have crimes with 6 schizophrenics in a hospice
- matched pairs design
- practice CPT before hand
- had an injection tracer for brain
- PET scan
- quasi experiment
- opportunity sample.
- psychodynamic
- 44 thieves, 31 male, 13 female
- another 44 were control group; matched pairs.
- this was a case study.
- what makes a child lead to delinquency?
- mothers were involved in the procedures, mothers gave details through a talk
- they were graded in terms of severity, ones who continuously stole, 22 of them and then 22 who only committed one theft.
- 15 had higher IQ, two had lower, whilst 50% had 85 - 114 score.
- 1. intelligence done, 2. mother detailing, 3. over weeks kids talked about problems
- opportunity sampling.
- Behaviourist
- little Albert study.
- described as a controlled observation, as there was only one IV condition which was the building blocks
- session one was establishing the conditioned emotional response
- Albert was tested with a steel bar hit by a hammer making a noise.
- first time he was shown mouse, dog, newspaper, wig etc
- the rat was the NS, the steel bar was the UCR
- session two Albert was shown rat then sound.
- session three he was presented with generalisations e.g fur.
- session 4 was environment change and at 12 months was the last time he was tested
- Cognitive
- independent group design in a lab two experiments.
- g1 = 45 students, g2 = 150 students
- experiment one had participants shown traffic accidents then receiving a questionnaire
- experiment two was a two parter.
- p1 of two, was shown a film then split into 3 groups of 50.
- group one was asked 'how fast were the cars going when they smashed'
- group two were asked 'hit' and group 3 were asked nothing as they were the control group
- they were then asked as p2 of the 2nd round after a week later was their glass on the floor.
- about word suggestion and seeing if eye witness memory is good
- Positive
- it was a review of different research.
- interviews and questionaires were used and asked about subjective well being.
- used closed questions in the interviews aspect e.g ' how satisfied are you with daily life'
- observation was another way as they would send someone a message to say what they were doing at that current moment.
- correlations was another way to see what covaries with being happy.
- if a person sees events in a better way it can have a higher SWB
- there was also reviews and meta analysis.
- questionnaires could give qualitative and quantitived data.
- biological
Comments
No comments have yet been made