Peter Stolypin's reforms
- Created by: Miss.Hwan7
- Created on: 30-04-19 00:49
View mindmap
- Peter Stolypin 1906-1911 Prime minister
- Poltical reforms
- Pro-Tsar regime, introduced the stolypin necktie
- executed over 4000 people that opposed the Tsar regime or of any sort. Did not matter if false sometimes
- Supportedchanges in franchise to reduce effectiveness of Duma
- Placed it under control of landowners
- Reparation, payments abolished
- Pro-Tsar regime, introduced the stolypin necktie
- Land reforms
- Peasant banks plant money to peasants to buy lands
- Russia experienced regional changes like peasants moving to fertile lands e.g: Ukraine and Crimea.
- Check flashcard for stats.
- Russia experienced regional changes like peasants moving to fertile lands e.g: Ukraine and Crimea.
- Peasant banks plant money to peasants to buy lands
- Agricultural reform
- Dependance on mirs (local communes) was limiting
- Mirs were conservative and discourage peasants buying machines, told them what to grow.
- Peasant bank allowed peasants to have their own farms
- Dependance on mirs (local communes) was limiting
- Industrial reforms (benefitted economically but social issues)
- Russia had coal, oil,steel, wood and metals so traded with Bri, Fra & Germany
- Textile produced in greater quantities
- Led to urbanization
- Medical issue especially for proletariat, sanitation issues due to living in squalid houses
- Social unrest and demand for maximum working hours, health and insurance provision, factory inspection seemed radical to the tsar and this led built up long term bitterness
- Medical issue especially for proletariat, sanitation issues due to living in squalid houses
- Untitled
- Russia had coal, oil,steel, wood and metals so traded with Bri, Fra & Germany
- Poltical reforms
- negative effects of growth
- monopolies had exploited power and were undermining small business men
- lead to less consumer choice, reduction in employment rate, less income, can lead to scarcity of output and high prices, this casing inflation thus social unrest
- Countrry'sreliance on loans gave power to banks
- this can lead to high interest rate, non sympathetic ways of demanding debt paid etc.
- monopolies had exploited power and were undermining small business men
Comments
No comments have yet been made