PERSPECTIVES ON ETHICS
- Created by: Yzyl Quintana
- Created on: 07-01-18 16:59
View mindmap
- PERSPECTIVES ON ETHICS
- How DO we behave
- GILLIGAN'S MODEL
- Interpersonal relationships
- Responsibility for the well-being of others
- Women & men have different paths to moral development
- STAGES:
- 1) Pre-conventional: individual survival
- 2) Conventional:care for others
- 3) Post-conventional: care for self and others
- Interpersonal relationships
- KOHLBERG'S MODEL
- STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT
- 1) Children: rules, punishments, obedience
- 2) Individualism & Exchange (punishment only a risk)
- 3) Good interpersonal relationship
- 4) Mainting SOCIAL order
- 5) Social contract & individual rights
- (more male)
- HEINZ DILEMMA
- 1) Bad to steal
- 2) Drugist charging too much
- 3) Love right
- 4) Wrong - stealing = chaos
- 5) (not in favour of breaking the law) But it's okay sometimes when life is > property
- STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT
- GILLIGAN'S MODEL
- How SHOULD we behave
- Teological; CONSEQUENTALISTS
- Relativist
- Virtue-based; CHARACTER
- Ethics of care
- Solidarity community
- Relationships
- Habit/quality
- Proper goal of human life is HAPPINESS, achieved by living a virtuous life
- Ethics of care
- Virtue-based; CHARACTER
- Utilitarianism
- Practical
- Virtue-based; CHARACTER
- Ethics of care
- Solidarity community
- Relationships
- Habit/quality
- Proper goal of human life is HAPPINESS, achieved by living a virtuous life
- Ethics of care
- Virtue-based; CHARACTER
- Deontological perspective; NON-CONSEQUENTALISTS
- Absolutist
- R&R
- Concerned with what people do, not with the consequences of their actions
- Deals with intentions & motives
- Hard to reconcile conflicting duties
- Relativist
- Deontological perspective; NON-CONSEQUENTALISTS
- Absolutist
- R&R
- Concerned with what people do, not with the consequences of their actions
- Deals with intentions & motives
- Hard to reconcile conflicting duties
- Teological; CONSEQUENTALISTS
- How DO we behave
Comments
No comments have yet been made