Ontological Argument
- Created by: TheAwesomeOne
- Created on: 16-04-15 17:20
View mindmap
- Ontological Argument
- Introduction to the topic
- Type of argument
- a priori
- analytic
- the definition is true on its own
- deductive
- if you agree with and therefore accept the definitions and the premises, you must accept the conclusion
- Is existence part of defining somerhing?
- you can define something factually but that doesn't make it exist
- God cannot exist to fulfil the defition
- you can define something factually but that doesn't make it exist
- If ontological argument is 100% true, God must exis
- Type of argument
- Anselm
- 'God is that than which nothing greater can be conceived'
- Existence is part of perfection
- in 'The Proslogion'
- Can you compare God to an island?
- God is objective but an island is subjective
- you can think of a perfect island, but cannot think of perfect God
- there is no intrinsic maximum to the island - the is no limit on is perfection
- people would keep adding things to the island in order to make it perfect for them
- God is objective but an island is subjective
- Descartes
- Proof 1
- I exist
- In my mind, I have the concept of a perfect being
- As an imperfect being, I could not have conjured up the concept of a perfect being,
- The concept of a perfect being must therefore have originated from the perfect being itself
- A perfect being must exit in order to be perfect
- Therefore a perfect being exists.
- IS EXISTENCE A PREDICATE OF PERFECTON
- BIG JUMP
- A perfect being must exit in order to be perfect
- Therefore a perfect being exists.
- IS EXISTENCE A PREDICATE OF PERFECTON
- A perfect being must exit in order to be perfect
- CORRESPONDENCE THEORY OF TRUTH
- UNNECESSARY LINE
- A perfect being must exit in order to be perfect
- HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT YOU ARE IMPERFECT UNLESS THERE IS AN ABSOLUTE "PERFECT BEING"
- The concept of a perfect being must therefore have originated from the perfect being itself
- As an imperfect being, I could not have conjured up the concept of a perfect being,
- THE 'COGITO' IS CHALLENGIBLE
- In my mind, I have the concept of a perfect being
- I exist
- Proof 2
- The idea of God of a supremely perfect being
- A supremely being has all perfections
- existence is a perfection
- a supremely perfect being has the perfection of existence
- It is impossible to think of God as not existing
- Therefore God exists
- It is impossible to think of God as not existing
- a supremely perfect being has the perfection of existence
- existence is a perfection
- A supremely being has all perfections
- a reformulation of Anselm's argument
- The idea of God of a supremely perfect being
- Proof 1
- People who object to the argument
- Kant
- Empirical data is the only reliable way of knowing anything about the universe
- moving from a definition to reality is a mistake
- moving from a definition to reality is a mistake
- Existence is not a predicate
- existence is not associated with the definition of something - does not add to our understanding
- Empirical data is the only reliable way of knowing anything about the universe
- Hume
- it is a false assumption that necessary existence is a coherent concept
- existence can only ever be contigent
- everything said to exist can also be said to not exist
- We cannot define seething in existence, despite how many perfections it has
- Bertrand Russell
- existence not a predicate
- sentences appear to be making grammatically identical statements, but only within the rules of language
- need to go outside language to determine if something exists
- Moore
- existence is not a predicate
- it cannot be a predicate as it doesn't function grammatically like other predicates
- Gasking
- you can use the ontological **** to argue from the non-existence of God
- the creation of the world is the most supreme achievement conceivable
- The value of an achievement is measure by its intrinsic quality and the ability of its creator
- The greater the limitation of creator, the more impressive the achievement
- the greatest limitation would be non-existence
- Therefore, a world created by a non-existent creator would be greater (better) than one created by a existent creator
- An existing God is therefore not the greatest conceivable being, since as even greater being would be one that didn't exist
- defining non-existence as a predicate
- An existing God is therefore not the greatest conceivable being, since as even greater being would be one that didn't exist
- illogical - you cannot make something if you don't exist
- you must be in existence in order to do something
- Therefore, a world created by a non-existent creator would be greater (better) than one created by a existent creator
- the greatest limitation would be non-existence
- both achievement and creator was skilled
- The greater the limitation of creator, the more impressive the achievement
- This is 'a prior' but ONTO is 'a posteriori'
- starts with an object in the real world whereas ONTO starts with pure reason
- The value of an achievement is measure by its intrinsic quality and the ability of its creator
- the creation of the world is the most supreme achievement conceivable
- you can use the ontological **** to argue from the non-existence of God
- Richard Dawkins
- how can you reach such a significant conclusion (that God exists) without a single piece of data
- Kant
- Second Stage
- Malcolm
- God does exist now & will never die or be killed
- Thus, God is nessary or contingent - the only two possibilities
- If God did not exist now, he would be contingent and would never come into existence as he would have to create himself - logically impossible - or someone would have to create him - and that person would have to be God
- Plantiga
- As ours is a possible world, he must be present on our world and is perfect
- If God is TTWN, then he must be maximally great (biggest) and maximally excellent (perfect) in all possible worlds
- 'de dicto' - of words
- 'de' re' - of reality
- 'in intellectu' - in the mind
- 'in re' - in reality
- 'in intellectu' - in the mind
- 'de' re' - of reality
- doesn't have to be perfect, but must be greater than everyone & everything else
- Malcolm
- Introduction to the topic
Comments
No comments have yet been made