Occupiers liabilty

?
View mindmap
  • Occupiers liability 1957 & 1984
    • 1957
      • Lawful visitors/ occupiers
        • Person who controls the premises
          • Defenses
            • Contributory negligence
              • S2.3
                • considering whether the occupier has breached the common duty of carte
            • Volenti
              • S2.5
                • No injury s done where claimant accepts risk
            • Warnings
              • S2.4
                • if an occupier gives a visitor a sufficient warning of damage the occupier will not be liable
        • S2.1
          • An occupier of the premises owes a common duty of care to visitors to those premises
    • 1984
      • Tresspassers
        • entering without permission
        • does not cover damage to property only personal injury
      • duty is only owed if the trespasser falls under certain requirements
    • COMMON LAW UNTIL 1957
    • Implied permission
      • lowery v walker
      • The police/fire brigade
    • rights of way
      • A person using a public right of way is not considered a visitor therefore doesn't owe a duty of care
    • person exercising a call
      • S2.3
        • A occupier may expect that a person in the exercise of his causing will appreciate and guard against and special risks ordinary incident to it so far as the occupiers leaves him to do so
    • Independent contractors
      • S2.4
        • Independent contractors will be found liable when there activities fall below the common duty of care, unless they take reasonable steps.

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Law of Tort resources »