"Neither Aquinas nor Fletcher would object to animal testing" Discuss.
- Created by: CourtneyH123456789
- Created on: 25-06-18 22:43
View mindmap
- "Neither Aqunias nor Fletcher would object to animal testing." Discuss
- Food/intensive farming
- Natural Law/ Aqunias
- Leads to an ordered Society as there is less starvation
- Deontological - the act of intensive farming is good as it makes more food so we don't need to worry about the consequences.
- Untitled
- Situation Ethics/ Fletcher
- Not the most loving thing to do for animals as they are killed and kept in cramped conditions
- Helps feed millions of people and keeps them alive which is the most loving thing to do.
- Natural Law/ Aqunias
- Medical Experiments
- Natural Law/ Aquinas
- Good for primary precept of preservation of life so he would accept it.
- Deontological- so as the act of deforming animals is wrong, it doesn't matter that it saves lives
- Situation Ethics
- Most loving thing to do as could help cure diseases
- If experiments are for anti-drugs medication then it is not the most loving thing to do as humans chose to take drugs.
- Natural Law/ Aquinas
- Blood Sports
- Natural Law/ Aquinas
- Doesn't lead to an ordered society so is bad.
- Deontological- so the act of killing animals for fun is wrong regardless of how much people enjoy it.
- Situation Ethics/ Fletcher.
- Not the most loving thing to kill and torture an animal.
- Natural Law/ Aquinas
- Organs for transplants
- Natural Law/ Aquinas
- Preserves life for humans so it is fine.
- Deontological- so the act of saving humans is good it doesn't matter if the animal is harmed.
- Situation Ethics/ Fletcher
- Loving thing to save a life but you are killing an animal.
- Untitled
- Natural Law/ Aquinas
- Food/intensive farming
Similar Religious Studies resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made