Milgram Evaluation
- Created by: Melissawalkerrr
- Created on: 01-03-15 13:07
View mindmap
- Milgram (1963) Evaluation
- Ethics
- Consent to the wrong study
- Deception - saw the electrodes and shock machine
- Right to withdraw was difficult
- Physical and psychological harm
- Change the way obedience is measured
- debriefed
- Sample and sampling Method
- Androcentiric
- Small
- Increase sample sze
- All from one area of America
- Repeat in other american states
- Costly and time effective recruiting process
- Only certain types of people will respond
- National newspaper, radio, internet, billboards (increase exposure)
- Research Method
- Controlled environment
- Manipulation of IV, measuring the DV
- Low ecological validity
- Replicate in real life environments eg schools
- easily replicated
- standardized procedure
- Reliability
- High level of standardisation
- Lacks generalisability
- Increase size
- Change recruitment method
- include females
- Ecological Validity
- Sample
- Lacks generalisabiltiy
- Replicate in school
- Setting
- Yale University
- Task
- Wouldn't be asked to give someone an electric shock
- Change punishment
- Wouldn't be asked to give someone an electric shock
- Sample
- Ethics
Comments
No comments have yet been made