Attachment: The Strange Situation

?
View mindmap
  • Mary Ainsworth's Strange Situation
    • Definition of attatchment
      • An emotional bond between a child and a caregiver, which is reciprocal (two-way) and long lasting
    • Background
      • Until the 1960's/70's, there was an assumption that if an infants physical needs were well looked after, the would grow up to be fine.
        • Physical needs include:
          • Food
          • Warmth
          • Being clean and dry
        • Mary Ainsworth  believed that emotional needs were just as important as physical needs
          • Emotional needs include:
            • Physical contact (cuddles)
            • Social interaction
            • Being aware that someone will respond to them
          • Ainsworth conducted observational work in Africa and began to develop the theory that the quality of the caregiver-infant relationship could shape the child's personality for the rest of their life
    • Aim
      • To see if caregiver sensitivity affects the type and quality of attatchment
        • Caregiver sensitivity: how good a parent is at reading their child's signals
    • Procedure
      • 100 child-mother pairs from Baltimore, USA
      • Part A
        • Natural observations
          • Took place during the first year of the infants lives
          • Ainsworth visited the pairs at home every 3/4 months and observed them in their natural environment
            • Assessed the quality of their parenting
              • Is the parent sensitive to their child's needs?
              • Is the parent consistent in how they respond to their child's needs?
      • Part B
        • When the child was 1 year old, the pair were invited to take part in a controlled observation
          • This part of the observation tested 4 of the infants behaviours
            • Willingness to explore
            • Separation anxiety
            • Stranger anxiety
            • Reunion behaviour
        • Consisted of 8 episodes:
          • 1) The parent and infant are introduced to the room.
          • 2) The caregiver sits and watches the child play
          • 3) The stranger enters and interacts with the infant
          • 4) First separation - the child and stranger are left alone. The stranger tries to interact with the infant
          • 5) First reunion - the caregiver returns and the stranger leaves
          • 6) Second separation - the parent leaves and the infant is left alone
          • 7) The stranger returns and tries to interact with the child
          • 8) Second reunion - the caregiver returns and the stranger leaves
    • Findings
      • Attachments  followed a pattern where infants could be classified as one of three attachment types
        • Secure
          • 70% of pairs
          • Observed behaviour included:
            • Willing to explore with parent as a base
            • Some stranger anxiety
            • Easily comforted on reunion
            • Moderate separation anxiety
          • Linked to sensitive and consistent caregiving
        • Insecure avoidant
          • 20% of pairs
          • Observed behaviour included:
            • Willing to explore
            • Very little stranger anxiety
            • Very little separation anxiety
            • Little emotional response on reunion
          • Linked to unresponsive caregiving. The child has learnt not to expect much from their caregiver
        • Insecure resistant
          • 10% of pairs
          • Observed behaviour included:
            • Not willing to explore
            • Extreme separation anxiety
            • Extreme stranger anxiety
            • Remains distressed on reunion
          • Linked to inconsistent or unpredictable caregiving
    • AO3 Evaluation
      • Ethics
        • Protection from harm
          • Deliberately putting a child under stress
        • Fully informed consent
          • Consent comes from the parent, not the child
      • Internal validity
        • Socially desirable behaviour
        • Ainsworth claimed that attachment type was permanent, however Waters' research found that only 72% of people keep the same attachment type into adeulthood
      • Population Validity
        • Based on American norms
          • Ethnocentric
      • Reliability
        • Main and Solomon identified a 4th attachment type
          • Insecure disorganised

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Psychology resources:

See all Psychology resources »See all Attachment resources »