Loss of Control - Partial Defence

HideShow resource information
  • Created by: Janki
  • Created on: 07-12-14 11:46
View mindmap
  • Loss of Control
    • S52 Coroners and Justice Act
    • 1) Qualifying trigger
      • D fears serious violence or D is provoked due to 'things done or things said' which were of an extremely grave character
        • Doughty - 'things done or things said'
        • Humphries - the trigger may be cumulative
        • Clinton - sexual infidelity does not count as a trigger, however other triggers may exist around it
        • Johnson - D can begin the provocation and this will not necessarily remove the defence from them
        • Pearson - the provoking act does not have to be aimed at D
    • 2) Loss of self control
      • Need not be sudden but cannot be considered a desire for revenge or a cooling off period
        • Ballie - the time space may have acted as a winding up period here the D became more and more angry
        • Ahluwalia- the reaction need not be 'sudden'.
        • Thornton - there cannot be a 'cooling off period'
        • Ibrams and Gregory - reaction must not be a considered desire for revenge
    • 3) A reasonable person of D's sex, age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint in the circumstances of D, would have acted in the same way
      • Camplin - age and sex are relevant in deciding the level of self-control expected
      • Holley - short temper cannot be included
      • Gregson - characteristics cannot be considered in the level of self control to be expected of D, but can be considered in terms of how quickly they become provoked

Comments

No comments have yet been made

Similar Law resources:

See all Law resources »See all Criminal law resources »