Levels-Of-Processing Theory: Studies
A mind map of all of the studies about LOP, supporting and opposing, with the reason why they support of oppose.
- Created by: Xanthe
- Created on: 30-11-13 13:24
View mindmap
- Levels-Of-Processing Theory: Studies
- Opposing
- HM Case Study
- Supports Multi-Store Model
- Smythe and Costal
- Supports Multi-Store Model
- Ramponi
- remember through association, not processing method
- Reber et al
- words not remembered because of processing method
- HM Case Study
- Supporting
- Nyberg
- required more activity because semantic is deeper processing
- Elias and Perfetti
- showed different levels where deeper had better recall
- Grardiner et al
- semantic learning worked despite damage, proving levels
- Glenburg et al
- elaboration is semantic and improved memory
- Hyde and Jenkins
- repetition is a bu-product not processing
- Craik and Tulving
- 96% processed semantically
- Jarvis
- showed semantic learning created better recall in exams
- Nyberg
- Opposing
Similar Psychology resources:
Teacher recommended
Comments
No comments have yet been made